>>
>> Im not clear how I'd do that. the data being passed up from the kernel is a
>> variable size. To use copyout I'd have to pass a
>> pointer with a static buffer, right?
>
> Correct, you can pass along the size, and if it's not large enough
> try again... Less than ideal...
>
>> Is there a way
Laurie Jennings wrote this message on Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 17:52 -0700:
>
> On Wed, 7/29/15, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
>
> Subject: Re: Locking Memory Question
> To: "Laurie Jennings"
> Cc: "John Baldwin" , freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Date: Wednesday,
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197535
Marius Strobl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|New
On Wednesday, July 29, 2015 03:26:46 PM Laurie Jennings wrote:
>
> I have a problem and I can't quite figure out where to look. This is what Im
> doing:
>
> I have an IOCTL to read a block of data, but the data is too large to return
> via ioctl. So to get the data,
> I allocate a block in a ke
On Wed, 7/29/15, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Subject: Re: Locking Memory Question
To: "Laurie Jennings"
Cc: "John Baldwin" , freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Date: Wednesday, July 29, 2015, 7:25 PM
Laurie Jennings via
freebsd-net wrote this message on Wed
Laurie Jennings via freebsd-net wrote this message on Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at
15:26 -0700:
>
> I have a problem and I can't quite figure out where to look. This is what Im
> doing:
>
> I have an IOCTL to read a block of data, but the data is too large to return
> via ioctl. So to get the data,
>
I have a problem and I can't quite figure out where to look. This is what Im
doing:
I have an IOCTL to read a block of data, but the data is too large to return
via ioctl. So to get the data,
I allocate a block in a kernel module:
foo = malloc(1024000,M_DEVBUF,M_WAITOK);
I pass up a pointer
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201947
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
--
You are
John-Mark Gurney wrote this message on Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 09:11 -0700:
> George Neville-Neil wrote this message on Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:35 -0400:
> > That's fine so long as its removed in HEAD now, and then the warning can
> > go into 10 aka 10.3.
>
> As I said, setkey doesn't support it.. a
George Neville-Neil wrote this message on Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:35 -0400:
> That's fine so long as its removed in HEAD now, and then the warning can
> go into 10 aka 10.3.
As I said, setkey doesn't support it.. and I looked at the ports for
racoon2 and strongswan (has it in their library, but,
rodrigc added a comment.
@glebius: Nikos updated the patch. Can you review it?
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1944
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: nvass-gmx.com, bz, trociny, kristof, gnn, zec, rodrigc, glebius, eri
Cc: farr
That's fine so long as its removed in HEAD now, and then the warning can
go into 10 aka 10.3.
Best,
George
On 28 Jul 2015, at 13:25, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi,
I'd put together a deprecation plan, which starts with the kernel
warning that this stuff is being removed, MFC that to stable/10 and
13 matches
Mail list logo
