That's fine so long as its removed in HEAD now, and then the warning can go into 10 aka 10.3.

Best,
George


On 28 Jul 2015, at 13:25, Adrian Chadd wrote:

Hi,

I'd put together a deprecation plan, which starts with the kernel
warning that this stuff is being removed, MFC that to stable/10 and
stable/9 so people aren't surprised when they upgrade, and then have
it removed in 11.



-adrian


On 28 July 2015 at 04:34, Daniel Plominski <dan...@plominski.eu> wrote:
instead of code to remove it is a better idea manuals to revise, people
depend on old recommendations like
https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/ipsec.html

would be better:
https://blog.plitc.eu/2014/freebsd-10-ipv4-vpn-relay-ipsec-entryopenvpn-middleopenvpn-exit-node-mit-jails/

or the racoon example from:
https://blog.plitc.eu/2014/freebsd-10-ipv4-ipsec-net-to-net-vpn-in-der-jail/

best regards

Daniel

_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to