i agree,
i am not good in english as networking administor from Tokyo.
but when i read the page, i see that the main idea is so call "modular
design" and there is a long way to catch up the freebsd's ipfw
anyway, i dont think it can compare to freebsd's ipfw, as Smith said their
ipfw is the versio
Op 17 nov. 2014 om 16:37 heeft Dag-Erling Smørgrav het volgende
geschreven:
> Willem Jan Withagen writes:
>> The constraints as you put them are indeed rather tight. There is little
>> to be done about it. I was not aware of the fact that 11.0 is planned
>> for release in such short time.
>
>
On 11/17/14, 3:02 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
On Nov 17, 2014, at 12:46 AM, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
Hi,
PROPOSAL
==
I would like to get feedback on the following proposal.
In the head branch (CURRENT), I would like to enable
VIMAGE with this commit:
PATCH
==
Index: sys/conf/NOTES
==
Willem Jan Withagen writes:
> The constraints as you put them are indeed rather tight. There is little
> to be done about it. I was not aware of the fact that 11.0 is planned
> for release in such short time.
It isn't. ISTR that the target is 2015Q4.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
__
On 17-11-2014 12:42, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On 17 Nov 2014, at 11:20 , Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>
>> I think I understand your critique, but then on the other hand I wonder
>> where the reluctance is As I read it, things are going to be enabled
>> in CURRENT only (for the time). Which is e
On 17 Nov 2014, at 11:20 , Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
> I think I understand your critique, but then on the other hand I wonder
> where the reluctance is As I read it, things are going to be enabled
> in CURRENT only (for the time). Which is exactly for the reasons you
> worry about: Is it go
On 17-11-2014 12:02, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Nov 17, 2014, at 12:46 AM, Craig Rodrigues
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> PROPOSAL == I would like to get feedback on the following
>> proposal. In the head branch (CURRENT), I would like to enable
>> VIMAGE with this commit:
>>
>>
>> PATCH ===
On Nov 17, 2014, at 12:46 AM, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> Hi,
>
> PROPOSAL
> ==
> I would like to get feedback on the following proposal.
> In the head branch (CURRENT), I would like to enable
> VIMAGE with this commit:
>
>
> PATCH
> ==
>
> Index: sys/conf/NOTES
> ==
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:48:13 +0800, Sato Kentney wrote:
> I saw a email in dragonflybsd email list, someone is doing this!
> http://www.dragonflybsd.org/docs/ipfw2/
We've had 'ipfw2' for a very long while. I couldn't help wondering why
DF wouldn't just import our many years of development and
