i agree, i am not good in english as networking administor from Tokyo. but when i read the page, i see that the main idea is so call "modular design" and there is a long way to catch up the freebsd's ipfw
anyway, i dont think it can compare to freebsd's ipfw, as Smith said their ipfw is the version without in-kernel NAT and tables .all these important features On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Ian Smith <smi...@nimnet.asn.au> wrote: > On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:48:13 +0800, Sato Kentney wrote: > > > I saw a email in dragonflybsd email list, someone is doing this! > > http://www.dragonflybsd.org/docs/ipfw2/ > > We've had 'ipfw2' for a very long while. I couldn't help wondering why > DF wouldn't just import our many years of development and experience > rather than using bycn82's 'rewrite'? .. but DF already has ipfw2: > > http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/cgi/web-man?command=ipfw§ion=ANY > > man page dated October 2008. Before tables, in-kernel NAT, later > dummynet updates and no doubt more. So why not start from there? > > cheers, Ian > -- ありがとう 佐藤柯德 Sato K. _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
