Is there any known issue that prevents disabling ipv6 and
auto_linklocal on members of a lagg or bridge that is using ipv6?
I have em0 and em1 which are members of lagg0 and lagg0 is a member of
bridge0. This is for a server that runs man jails, including some vnet
jails that have tap devices that
On 07/29/14 13:48, Rick Macklem wrote:
> Russell L. Carter:
>
> The "directories within a file system" exports are only enforced by
> the Mount protocol that NFSv3 uses to talk to mountd. (NFSv4 does not
> use the Mount protocol.) These are considered "administrative controls",
> which is a nic
Russell L. Carter:
>
>
> On 07/29/14 11:21, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> > Rick Macklem wrote this message on Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 18:47
> > -0400:
> >> Russell L. Carter wrote:
> >>> On 07/28/14 05:55, Rick Macklem wrote:
> >>>
> Assuming /export is one file system on the server, put all
> >>>
On 07/29/14 11:21, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Rick Macklem wrote this message on Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 18:47 -0400:
>> Russell L. Carter wrote:
>>> On 07/28/14 05:55, Rick Macklem wrote:
>>>
Assuming /export is one file system on the server, put all
the exports in a single entry, somethin
John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Rick Macklem wrote this message on Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 18:47 -0400:
> > Russell L. Carter wrote:
> > > On 07/28/14 05:55, Rick Macklem wrote:
> > >
> > > > Assuming /export is one file system on the server, put all
> > > > the exports in a single entry, something like:
>
Rick Macklem wrote this message on Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 18:47 -0400:
> Russell L. Carter wrote:
> > On 07/28/14 05:55, Rick Macklem wrote:
> >
> > > Assuming /export is one file system on the server, put all
> > > the exports in a single entry, something like:
> > > V4: /export -sec=sys -network 1
We use exactly the sort of configuration you showed, and it works perfectly
with our FreeBSD systems.
It is possible you are running afoul of spanning-tree behavior on the port.
Access ports are treated as "edge" ports and can activate right away, while
trunk ports must go through the full lis
--On 29 July 2014 09:24 -0400 Mike Tancsa wrote:
Would it not be better to have
switchport trunk allowed vlan 2200-2300
otherwise its not clear to me what would be tagged and what would not be
tagged as vlan 2000, no ?
I don't think that's the issue - I've had a couple of emails from other
On 7/29/2014 9:02 AM, Karl Pielorz wrote:
Switch side - the port is configured with:
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk native vlan 2000
switchport trunk allowed vlan 2000,2200-2300
switchport mode trunk
Would it not be better to have
switchport trunk allowed vlan 2200-2300
Hi,
I've got a Cisco 3750X switch a colleague is setting up. We've got this
configured - but it doesn't seem to talk nicely to our FBSD 10.0-R box,
looks like some kind of VLAN issue (but shouldn't be).
Switch side - the port is configured with:
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchp
10 matches
Mail list logo