A whole extra line is required in rc.conf to make that situation work and
since it is an edge case and doesn't apply in 99% of uses it really
shouldn't be catered for... but what do I know? There has been a few insane
changes recently ;)
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-...@free
On Aug 26, 2013, at 5:30 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> ... is there any reason we wouldn't want to have the TX and RX for a given
> flow mapped to the same core?
>
Given than an inbound ACK is likely to be turned into an outbound segment
from within the same execution context and CPU instance, I c
None that I can think of.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> ... is there any reason we wouldn't want to have the TX and RX for a given
> flow mapped to the same core?
>
>
>
>
> -adrian
>
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
ht
... is there any reason we wouldn't want to have the TX and RX for a given
flow mapped to the same core?
-adrian
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-n
Hi,
Sorry for the cross-posting, but I'm not 100% sure where the problem
is, either with the Jenkins port, Java, or FreeBSD networking code..
I recently tried to install the devel/jenkins port
on two separate boxes:
(1) box 1 running FreeBSD-9-STABLE.
(2) box 2 running running FreeBSD-CURREN
On 26.08.2013 19:18, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
Hi Net,
I'm an infrequent traveler through the networking code and would
appreciate some feedback on some proposed solutions to issues Spectra
has seen with outbound LACP traffic.
lacp_select_tx_port() uses the flow ID if it is available in the outbou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 08/26/13 11:10, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 8/26/13 7:56 PM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Hiroki Sato
>> wrote:
>>> Xin Li wrote in
>>> <521670ff.6080...@delphij.net>:
>>>
>>> de> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 7:16 AM, Robert Watson wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Aug 2013, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
>
>> On 24.08.2013 00:54, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I'd like to commit this to -10. It migrates the if_lagg locking
>>> from a rw lock to a rm lock. We see a bit of contention between t
On 8/26/13 7:56 PM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Xin Li wrote
in <521670ff.6080...@delphij.net>:
de> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
de> Hash: SHA512
de>
de> Hi,
de>
de> I've noticed that we do not install default route last (after other
de>
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
> Hi Net,
>
> I'm an infrequent traveler through the networking code and would
> appreciate some feedback on some proposed solutions to issues Spectra
> has seen with outbound LACP traffic.
>
> lacp_select_tx_port() uses the flow ID if it i
Hi Net,
I'm an infrequent traveler through the networking code and would
appreciate some feedback on some proposed solutions to issues Spectra
has seen with outbound LACP traffic.
lacp_select_tx_port() uses the flow ID if it is available in the outbound
mbuf to select the outbound port. The igb
On 26.08.2013 16:46, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 04:27:59PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
...
1. lle lock to rmlock.
2. if_addr and IN_ADDR locks to rmlocks.
3. routing table locking (rmlocks, and by doing away with rtentry locks and
refcounting
through copy-out on lookup
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 04:27:59PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
...
>
> 1. lle lock to rmlock.
>
> 2. if_addr and IN_ADDR locks to rmlocks.
>
> 3. routing table locking (rmlocks, and by doing away with rtentry locks and
> refcounting
> through copy-out on lookup and prohibition of having a
On 25.08.2013 16:42, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 24 August 2013 10:09, Andre Oppermann mailto:an...@freebsd.org>> wrote:
On 24.08.2013 19:04, Adrian Chadd wrote:
I'm very close to starting an mbuf batching thing to use in a few
places like receive,
transmit and
transmit
On 21.08.2013 21:11, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
I'd like to add a last-active timestamp to the structure that tracks the
LRO state in a NIC's rx handler. This is r254336 in user/np/cxl_tuning
that will be merged to head if there are no objections.
No objections. This is good thing.
The last time
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> Xin Li wrote
> in <521670ff.6080...@delphij.net>:
>
> de> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> de> Hash: SHA512
> de>
> de> Hi,
> de>
> de> I've noticed that we do not install default route last (after other
> de> static routes). I think we
Xin Li wrote
in <521670ff.6080...@delphij.net>:
de> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
de> Hash: SHA512
de>
de> Hi,
de>
de> I've noticed that we do not install default route last (after other
de> static routes). I think we should probably install it last, since the
de> administrator may legiti
Note: to view an individual PR, use:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsolete releases.
S Tracker
18 matches
Mail list logo
