On 25.08.2013 16:42, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 24 August 2013 10:09, Andre Oppermann <an...@freebsd.org <mailto:an...@freebsd.org>> wrote:On 24.08.2013 19:04, Adrian Chadd wrote: I'm very close to starting an mbuf batching thing to use in a few places like receive, transmit and transmit completion -> free path. I'd be interested in your review/feedback and testing as it sounds like something you can easily stress test there. :) I'd strongly recommend fixing a number of other places and collect lower hanging fruit before starting with mbuf batching. I'm open to suggestions. Scott killed our high hanging fruit (VM / buffer page lifecycle) and what's left is not very low. If you have any recommendations, I'd love to hear them.
1. lle lock to rmlock. 2. if_addr and IN_ADDR locks to rmlocks. 3. routing table locking (rmlocks, and by doing away with rtentry locks and refcounting through copy-out on lookup and prohibition of having any pointers into the rtable). -- Andre _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
