Re: TCP Loopback Connections with the Same Src/Dest Port

Hi, Matt, Please heck this IETF Internet-Draft: Some comments: On 07/17/2013 01:08 PM, Matt Miller wrote: > > Some questions we had: > > - Has anyone else ever seen these same src/dest address/port TCP > connections created? D

Re: re0 not working at boot on -CURRENT

On 07/19/13 03:58, Chris H wrote: On 07/10/13 19:47, Guido Falsi wrote: On 07/10/13 09:04, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 10:28:29PM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote: Hi, I have a PC with an integrate re ethernet interface, pciconf identifies it like this: re0@pci0:3:0:0: class=0x0200

Re: IPv6 NDP, static subnet entries

Georg Bege wrote in <1374064573.525.2.camel@atwork>: th> Hello FreeBSD users th> th> Im in need of proxying an NDP entry, th> due my bad provider using IPv6 bridging. th> My entire subnet is not routed correctly, however I managed to get it th> working with ndp -s proxy - sadly this doesnt wo

Re: re0 not working at boot on -CURRENT

>> On 07/10/13 19:47, Guido Falsi wrote: >>> On 07/10/13 09:04, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 10:28:29PM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote: > Hi, > > I have a PC with an integrate re ethernet interface, pciconf identifies > it like this: > > re0@pci0:3:0:0: class

Re: re0 not working at boot on -CURRENT

> On 07/10/13 19:47, Guido Falsi wrote: >> On 07/10/13 09:04, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 10:28:29PM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote: Hi, I have a PC with an integrate re ethernet interface, pciconf identifies it like this: re0@pci0:3:0:0: class=0x02

Re: Duplicate Address Detection misfire?

On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 10:39 PM, Kevin Day wrote: > > On Jun 30, 2013, at 6:48 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: > > > I have a FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE vmware guest running. It is using the > > "bridged" type of networking with VMWare. It gets it's IPv4 address from > > DHCP (successfully) and then fai

Re: re0 not working at boot on -CURRENT

On 07/10/13 19:47, Guido Falsi wrote: On 07/10/13 09:04, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 10:28:29PM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote: Hi, I have a PC with an integrate re ethernet interface, pciconf identifies it like this: re0@pci0:3:0:0: class=0x02 card=0x11c01734 chip=0x816810ec

Re: Atheros AR9002U-2NG based TP-LINK TL-WN822N Ver:2.0 - adding support to FreeBSD

On 07/18/13 17:39, CeDeROM wrote: Hello :-) Hi, The atheros driver has the endpoint numbers hardcoded. I recommend using relative indexes for each interface. Should be trivial to fix. I'll leave that for the author of the uath driver. --HPS ugen1.3: at usbus1 uath0: on usbus1 uath0: c

Re: Atheros AR9002U-2NG based TP-LINK TL-WN822N Ver:2.0 - adding support to FreeBSD

On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > It's not uath. It's a different beast entirely. > > Basically, it requires someone with USB clue to write the USB glue > between the ath(4) and ath_hal(4) code and the USB interface. > > Look at what ath9k_htc implements. It uses most of ath9k

Re: Atheros AR9002U-2NG based TP-LINK TL-WN822N Ver:2.0 - adding support to FreeBSD

It's not uath. It's a different beast entirely. Basically, it requires someone with USB clue to write the USB glue between the ath(4) and ath_hal(4) code and the USB interface. Look at what ath9k_htc implements. It uses most of ath9k, but it implements a data/control pipe over USB and some comman

Atheros AR9002U-2NG based TP-LINK TL-WN822N Ver:2.0 - adding support to FreeBSD

Hello :-) I have just bought USB WiFi b/g/n dongle from TP-LINK model TL-WN822B Ver:2.0 [1] which use following chipsets: Atheros AR9002U-2NG, Atheros AR7010, Atheros AR9287. It looks nice bacuse it cost ~20EUR it has external antennas and has very good opinions. Now, I start to think that finding

Re: bind error when using SO_REUSEPORT(implies SO_REUSEADDR)

On Wednesday, July 17, 2013 5:23:37 pm Mikolaj Golub wrote: > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:12:46AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > On Thursday, March 15, 2012 8:07:46 pm Sean Bruno wrote: > > > On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 16:59 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: > > > > Hey, I just found a bind bug ticket in my queue