Old Synopsis: An error of calculating TCP sequence number will resault in the
machine to restart
New Synopsis: [tcp] [patch] An error of calculating TCP sequence number will
resault in the machine to restart
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
R
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> Have been kept fairly busy with other matters, one thing I could do short
> term is
> change the defines in igb the way I did in the em driver so you could still
> define
> the older if_start entry. Right now those are based on OS version and so
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 06:54:31PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> So, this started as a simple question, but the answer was quite
> unexpected to me.
> Let's say we have an opened and listen-ed socket and let's assume that
> we know that one thread is blocked in accept(2) and another thread is
> ca
Have been kept fairly busy with other matters, one thing I could do short
term is
change the defines in igb the way I did in the em driver so you could still
define
the older if_start entry. Right now those are based on OS version and so
you will
automatically get if_transmit, but I could change it
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 03:31:19PM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote:
>> J> UH, maybe asking the owner of the driver would help :)
>> J>
>> J> ... and no, I've never been aware of doing anything
Hi Folks,
I have a server with a 10G intel card, X520-DA2, and it is working
fine, interface shows up as ix0
On this card, I have one interface connected at 10G, and it has 2
vlans on it (no "plain" IP is on the machine or on this card, only via
these vlans)
I have it also configured them with s
So, this started as a simple question, but the answer was quite unexpected to
me.
Let's say we have an opened and listen-ed socket and let's assume that we know
that one thread is blocked in accept(2) and another thread is calling close(2).
What is going to happen?
Turns out that practically no
Hello, Mattia.
You wrote 28 марта 2013 г., 18:58:32:
MR> And now your Win7 should be happy.
I don't want to add second dhcpd (unfortunately, isc-dhcpd could not
process IPv4 and IPv6 in single process), and it is not a problem to
have IPv4 only DNS when dhcpd is accessible. And if dhcpd
Am 28.03.2013 15:58, schrieb Mattia Rossi:
Am 28.03.2013 14:49, schrieb Lev Serebryakov:
Hello, Freebsd-net.
This question is not very FreeBSD specific, but as my router and DNS
server are FreeBSD-based, I think a could ask it here and don't
subscribe do BIND-related list, Ok?
When DHCPv4
Am 28.03.2013 14:49, schrieb Lev Serebryakov:
Hello, Freebsd-net.
This question is not very FreeBSD specific, but as my router and DNS
server are FreeBSD-based, I think a could ask it here and don't
subscribe do BIND-related list, Ok?
When DHCPv4 is not available, Win7 clients on my network
Hello, Freebsd-net.
This question is not very FreeBSD specific, but as my router and DNS
server are FreeBSD-based, I think a could ask it here and don't
subscribe do BIND-related list, Ok?
When DHCPv4 is not available, Win7 clients on my network pick up
proper IPv6 prefix, but cannot pick up DN
11 matches
Mail list logo
