On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 04:12:19PM +0300, Vladimir Vladimir wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've got an issue with new mother board ASUS P8Z77-M PRO.
>
> My FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE can't set up Network interface for integrated NIC
> Realtek 8168/8.
>
> I have tried FreeBSD-8.2, and FreeBSD-9.0
> I' down
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Olivier Cochard-Labbé
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Marcin Cieslak wrote:
>> I have just updated by 9.0-something laptop to 10.0-CURRENT r240948
>> and it very quickly panics after enabling network with IPsec
>> (I am using IPsec w/racoon for IPv4 ove
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Marcin Cieslak wrote:
> I have just updated by 9.0-something laptop to 10.0-CURRENT r240948
> and it very quickly panics after enabling network with IPsec
> (I am using IPsec w/racoon for IPv4 over 802.11, also using
> tunelled IPv6).
I don't know if it's related
I have just updated by 9.0-something laptop to 10.0-CURRENT r240948
and it very quickly panics after enabling network with IPsec
(I am using IPsec w/racoon for IPv4 over 802.11, also using
tunelled IPv6).
It looks like in this part of sys/netipsec/ipsec_output.c:
447 #ifdef DEV_ENC
448
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 3:38 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
>> ix:rx -> udp -> udpinp -> in_multi_mtx -> ix:core -> ix:rx
>
> Hmm, I'm not sure where the 'in_multi_mtx -> ix:core' bit comes from.
> I think that is the broken part of this. The SIOCADDMULTI and SIOCDELMULTI
> ioctls are invoked without an
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Vijay Singh wrote:
> > Jack, I am wondering if this could be avoided if we can avoid to
> > enqueue the task OR re-enable interrupts if the other one is already
> > scheduled. Is this possible?
>
> It seems to me that ixgbe_handle_que() should only be doing
> ixgb
> Jack, I am wondering if this could be avoided if we can avoid to
> enqueue the task OR re-enable interrupts if the other one is already
> scheduled. Is this possible?
It seems to me that ixgbe_handle_que() should only be doing
ixgbe_rxeof(). When ever mq_start() is unable to send, it enqueues th
On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 3:08:22 pm Ryan Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 9:55 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> > You only have to drop the RX lock around if_input() if you use the same lock
> > for both TX and RX (as if_transmit() / if_start() can be invoked while locks
> > in the network
--- Исходное сообщение ---
От кого: "d...@mybsd.org.my"
Кому: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Дата: 26 сентября 2012, 21:22:31
Тема: DHCP server with a group of mac address
> Hi,
>
> i'm installing isc-dhcp42-server and run in the network for like 1000 node. i
> have like 1000 mac address
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 9:55 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> You only have to drop the RX lock around if_input() if you use the same lock
> for both TX and RX (as if_transmit() / if_start() can be invoked while locks
> in the network stack are held).
Last time I checked(FreeBSD 8.2), this is not true.
To do what you want you will have to make a script to collect the mac
addresses and insert into your dhcp.conf . Also check the dhcpd.conf(5)
called `SUBCLASSES`. as Paul suggested.
Marcos Alves
2012/9/26 Ahmad Faisal
> *You wrote:*
> *From:* marcos alves
> *To:* "d...@mybsd.org.my"
> *Sent
On 23.09.2012 17:35, Andrey Zonov wrote:
On 9/20/12 11:35 AM, Eggert, Lars wrote:
Hi,
On Sep 20, 2012, at 9:25, Andrey Zonov wrote:
Some of them may be read google's article about tuning TCP parameters
[1]. I convert most of TCP timers to sysctls [2] and we are using this
patch for few month
In dhcp.conf it describes ways to assign client's to classes. It further
explains
how to `deny` or `allow` those clients assigned to those classes.
Read the subsection from dhcpd.conf(5) called `SUBCLASSES`. It provides an
example which almost answers your question in its entirety.
~Paul
On We
Yes, as I indicated above - but users could manually assign IP
addresses, which means you can't really deny them access without
switchport level control.
- M
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:58 AM, d...@mybsd.org.my wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> i'm installing isc-dhcp42-server and run in the network for like 100
Hi,
i'm installing isc-dhcp42-server and run in the network for like 1000 node. i
have like 1000 mac address (servers, PC's, printers, phones, etc) which i put
in the text file.
FYI,
Any mac address (which is in the text file) who plug into the network will get
the ip address based on the v
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 6:55 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 25, 2012 4:40:58 pm Jack Vogel wrote:
> > Ah yes, at one time I was keeping the RX side lock when calling the
> stack,
> > but then as I recall that had problems, so the code now releases and
> > reaquires
> > as you can
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 6:53 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 25, 2012 4:19:01 pm Vijay Singh wrote:
> > > Vijay, can you test this to see if it helps with your test case?
> > >
> > >> Jack
> >
> > John, apologies for the delay. I have some data to share now.
> >
> > With your patc
Hi all,
I've got an issue with new mother board ASUS P8Z77-M PRO.
My FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE can't set up Network interface for integrated NIC
Realtek 8168/8.
I have tried FreeBSD-8.2, and FreeBSD-9.0
I' downloaded new distributions from freebsd.org and tried boot from them but
result the s
On Tuesday, September 25, 2012 4:40:58 pm Jack Vogel wrote:
> Ah yes, at one time I was keeping the RX side lock when calling the stack,
> but then as I recall that had problems, so the code now releases and
> reaquires
> as you can see. It results in some contention but I'm not sure that's
> avoid
On Tuesday, September 25, 2012 4:19:01 pm Vijay Singh wrote:
> > Vijay, can you test this to see if it helps with your test case?
> >
> >> Jack
>
> John, apologies for the delay. I have some data to share now.
>
> With your patch, the transmit side lock contention is all gone.
> However I still s
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 7:03 AM, d...@mybsd.org.my wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i'm installing isc-dhcp42-server and run in the network for like 1000
> node. i have like 1000 mac address (servers, PC's, printers, phones, etc)
> which i put in the text file.
>
> FYI,
>
> Any mac address (which is in the text f
Synopsis: [tap] OpenVPN TAP uses 99% CPU on releng_6 when if_tap is in
/boot/loader.conf
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: emaste
State-Changed-When: Wed Sep 26 12:52:36 UTC 2012
State-Changed-Why:
Submitter reports this works on stable/8.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr
On 26.09.2012 02:55, Vijay Singh wrote:
Folks, does the following patch make sense:
server@[/u/vijay/bsd/CODE/cur/sys/sys]# svn diff mbuf.h
Index: mbuf.h
===
--- mbuf.h (revision 240548)
+++ mbuf.h (working copy)
@@ -832,6
Hi,
i'm installing isc-dhcp42-server and run in the network for like 1000 node. i
have like 1000 mac address (servers, PC's, printers, phones, etc) which i put
in the text file.
FYI,
Any mac address (which is in the text file) who plug into the network will get
the ip address based on the v
I have not tested stable/9 yet, but stable/8 seems to be fine.
Given that FreeBSD 6 is no longer supported you can probably close this bug.
-Original Message-
From: ema...@freebsd.org [mailto:ema...@freebsd.org]
Sent: 26 September 2012 02:39 AM
To: Emile Coetzee; ema...@freebsd.org; free
25 matches
Mail list logo
