On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Vijay Singh <vijju.si...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Jack, I am wondering if this could be avoided if we can avoid to > > enqueue the task OR re-enable interrupts if the other one is already > > scheduled. Is this possible? > > It seems to me that ixgbe_handle_que() should only be doing > ixgbe_rxeof(). When ever mq_start() is unable to send, it enqueues the > new txq_task. Also, this is checked periodically from the timer > function as well. I will try an experiment to evaluate only more_rx in > ixgbe_msix_que() and change ixgbe_handle_que() to do rx processing > only. I will report back findings. > > Meanwhile it its immediately obvious to anyone what this will break, > please let me know. > > -vijay > OK, will be interested in the results. Jack _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
