16.07.2012 07:13, Bjoern A. Zeeb пишет:
>
> On 15. Jul 2012, at 20:54 , Mike Tancsa wrote:
>
>> On 7/10/2012 2:24 AM, Przemyslaw Frasunek wrote:
It seems, Przemyslaw Frasunek uses proxyarp?
I have no such problems but I do not use proxyarp.
Could you get rid of it, Przemyslaw?
>>>
Synopsis: ifconfig(8) fails to set MTU on multiple interfaces.
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Jul 16 03:16:57 UTC 2012
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer(s).
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=
On 7/15/2012 6:53 PM, Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
On 7/15/2012 3:26 AM, Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
Hmm, callout_active() is not used to check for whether the callout is
fired or not; it is used to check whether callout_reset() has been
called but callout_stop() is not yet been called. IMO,
callout_res
Old Synopsis: if_re no longer working in 9.x
New Synopsis: [re] if_re no longer working in 9.x [regression]
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Jul 16 03:15:41 UTC 2012
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer(s).
Old Synopsis: system hangs, fully or partially after receiving watchdog
timeouts on bge
New Synopsis: [bge] [hang] system hangs, fully or partially after receiving
watchdog timeouts on bge
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-
Old Synopsis: Wrongful replacement of interface connected net route
New Synopsis: [bgp] Wrongful replacement of interface connected net route
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Jul 16 03:03:35 UTC 2012
Responsible-Ch
Old Synopsis: bge: Network unavailable when booting directly to FreeBSD
New Synopsis: [bge] Network unavailable when booting directly to FreeBSD
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Jul 16 02:58:21 UTC 2012
Responsible
Old Synopsis: ng_l2tp incomming packet bypass pf firewall
New Synopsis: [ng] [pf] ng_l2tp incoming packet bypass pf firewall
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Jul 16 02:54:51 UTC 2012
Responsible-Changed-Why:
recla
Filed as,
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=169898
Thanks for looking into this when you get time.
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 04:49:23PM -0400, George Neville-Neil wrote:
>
> On Jul 12, 2012, at 12:55 , Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 10:55:16AM -0400,
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Reese Faucette wrote:
> On 7/15/2012 3:26 AM, Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
>
>> !tcp_timer_active() means that the connection's retransmit timer is
>> not _set_ yet (please note, it is _not_ "has fired"). As far as I
>> understand this code, it in turn means that this
On 15. Jul 2012, at 20:54 , Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On 7/10/2012 2:24 AM, Przemyslaw Frasunek wrote:
>>> It seems, Przemyslaw Frasunek uses proxyarp?
>>> I have no such problems but I do not use proxyarp.
>>> Could you get rid of it, Przemyslaw?
>>
>> No, I don't use proxy ARP. I have about 300 PPP
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> On 06/03/12 15:18, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 2:48 AM, Lawrence Stewart
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/31/12 13:33, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>>> [snip]
I used SIFTR at the suggestion of Lawrence Stewart who heade
On 7/10/2012 2:24 AM, Przemyslaw Frasunek wrote:
>> It seems, Przemyslaw Frasunek uses proxyarp?
>> I have no such problems but I do not use proxyarp.
>> Could you get rid of it, Przemyslaw?
>
> No, I don't use proxy ARP. I have about 300 PPPoE ng interfaces and 10 VLANs
> with plain IP traffic. A
On 7/15/2012 3:26 AM, Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
!tcp_timer_active() means that the connection's retransmit timer is
not _set_ yet (please note, it is _not_ "has fired"). As far as I
understand this code, it in turn means that this connection doesn't
have any segments that were sent but not yet AC
On 07/15/2012 04:38 PM, Hiroki Sato wrote:
>
> FYI, I am working on creating a port of your toolkit and will
> commit it into the ports collection.
Great! -- Please make sure to use this version of the tool (v1.2),
rather than the one that had been announced a couple of weeks ago,
since it contai
Hi,
Fernando Gont wrote
in <5002e024.4090...@gont.com.ar>:
fe> Folks,
fe>
fe> FYI, we've released "IPv6 toolkit v1.2": a set of IPv6 security
fe> assessment tools that were produced as part of a project I carried out
fe> on behalf of the UK CPNI.
fe>
fe> The tarball for version 1.2 of the tool
Folks,
FYI, we've released "IPv6 toolkit v1.2": a set of IPv6 security
assessment tools that were produced as part of a project I carried out
on behalf of the UK CPNI.
The tarball for version 1.2 of the tool is available at:
http://www.si6networks.com/research/ipv6-toolkit-v1.2.tar.gz>
Additiona
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 1:54 AM, Reese Faucette wrote:
> Hi, freebsd-net-
>
> I don't have a testcase for this at the moment, but there's a test
> in tcp_do_segment that looks backwards to me...
>
> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/release/9.0.0/sys/netinet/tcp_input.c?view=markup
>
> line 2398 -
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
