On 15. Jul 2012, at 20:54 , Mike Tancsa wrote:

> On 7/10/2012 2:24 AM, Przemyslaw Frasunek wrote:
>>> It seems, Przemyslaw Frasunek uses proxyarp?
>>> I have no such problems but I do not use proxyarp.
>>> Could you get rid of it, Przemyslaw?
>> 
>> No, I don't use proxy ARP. I have about 300 PPPoE ng interfaces and 10 VLANs
>> with plain IP traffic. ARP table has only < 50 entries, all of them are 
>> dynamic.
> 
> I had a new one. Unfortunately, it did not generate a coredump file for
> some reason.  Kernel was from ~ mid Feb
> 
> Fatal trap 9: general protection fault while in kernel mode
> cpuid = 1; apic id = 02
...
> Uptime: 151d12h10m10s
> ipfw: 11 Deny TCP 192.168.1.99:33822 208.47.254.32:80 in via ng471
> Dumping 883 out of 8145 MB:ipfw: 13 Deny UDP 64.7.157.21:512
> 192.168.254.46:137 in via ng21
> panic: bufwrite: buffer is not busy???
> cpuid = 1
> Uptime: 151d12h10m10s

Hmm this one means we didn't stop all CPUs properly on panic;  I think that
was fixed since?  At least it's the reason you didn't have a chance to get
the core dump.

However of course the initial problem leading to the panic of course
is its own issue still.

-- 
Bjoern A. Zeeb                                 You have to have visions!
   It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do!

_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to