On 15. Jul 2012, at 20:54 , Mike Tancsa wrote: > On 7/10/2012 2:24 AM, Przemyslaw Frasunek wrote: >>> It seems, Przemyslaw Frasunek uses proxyarp? >>> I have no such problems but I do not use proxyarp. >>> Could you get rid of it, Przemyslaw? >> >> No, I don't use proxy ARP. I have about 300 PPPoE ng interfaces and 10 VLANs >> with plain IP traffic. ARP table has only < 50 entries, all of them are >> dynamic. > > I had a new one. Unfortunately, it did not generate a coredump file for > some reason. Kernel was from ~ mid Feb > > Fatal trap 9: general protection fault while in kernel mode > cpuid = 1; apic id = 02 ... > Uptime: 151d12h10m10s > ipfw: 11 Deny TCP 192.168.1.99:33822 208.47.254.32:80 in via ng471 > Dumping 883 out of 8145 MB:ipfw: 13 Deny UDP 64.7.157.21:512 > 192.168.254.46:137 in via ng21 > panic: bufwrite: buffer is not busy??? > cpuid = 1 > Uptime: 151d12h10m10s
Hmm this one means we didn't stop all CPUs properly on panic; I think that was fixed since? At least it's the reason you didn't have a chance to get the core dump. However of course the initial problem leading to the panic of course is its own issue still. -- Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions! It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do! _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
