On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm suffering from low network performance on one of my FreeBSDs.
> I have an i386 8.2-RELEASE machine with an fxp(4) adapter. It's connected
> though a bunch of catalysts 2950 to another 8.2. While other machines in
> this serve
So when will you two have something consensus-y to commit? :-)
What I'm hoping for is:
* some traction on the MII bus / MDIO bus split and tidyup from stb, which
is nice;
* ray's switch API for speaking to userland with;
* agreeing on whether the correct place to put the driver(s) is where stb,
r
Hi.
I'm suffering from low network performance on one of my FreeBSDs.
I have an i386 8.2-RELEASE machine with an fxp(4) adapter. It's
connected though a bunch of catalysts 2950 to another 8.2. While other
machines in this server room using the same sequence of switches and the
same target sour
On 24.01.2012 16:07, Kirk Davis wrote:
-Original Message-
On 24.01.2012 09:18, Nikolay Denev wrote:
On Jan 23, 2012, at 11:39 PM, Marcin Markowski wrote:
Hello,
This message has been sent to freebsd-performance@ but got the
information that should contact also with freebsd-net@.
We u
Hello.
I have test boxes with em(4) network card - Intel 82563EB
FreeBSD version - 8.2 stable from 2012-01-15, amd64
When this NIC is full loaded livelock occurs - system is unresponsive
even from local console.
To generate load I use netsend from /usr/src/tools/tools/netrate/
but other traffic
>-Original Message-
>On 24.01.2012 09:18, Nikolay Denev wrote:
>> On Jan 23, 2012, at 11:39 PM, Marcin Markowski wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> This message has been sent to freebsd-performance@ but got the
>>> information that should contact also with freebsd-net@.
>>>
>>> We use FreeBSD
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 06:09:30AM +0900, rozhuk...@gmail.com wrote:
r> I found a comment in the code:
r> /*
r> * This node has all kinds of stuff that could be screwed by SMP.
r> * Until it gets it's own internal protection, we go through in
r> * single file. This could hur
- Original Message -
From: "Marcin Markowski"
I tried to compile the kernel with NETMAP on FreeBSD 8 and 9, but I get
warnings and
the compilation ends.
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
../../../dev/netmap/netmap.c: In function 'netmap_memory_init':
../../../dev/netmap/netmap.c:
On 24.01.2012 09:18, Nikolay Denev wrote:
On Jan 23, 2012, at 11:39 PM, Marcin Markowski wrote:
Hello,
This message has been sent to freebsd-performance@ but got
the information that should contact also with freebsd-net@.
We use FreeBSD as sniffer (libpcap programs) and we experience
performa
On 24.01.2012 09:18, Nikolay Denev wrote:
On Jan 23, 2012, at 11:39 PM, Marcin Markowski wrote:
Hello,
This message has been sent to freebsd-performance@ but got
the information that should contact also with freebsd-net@.
We use FreeBSD as sniffer (libpcap programs) and we experience
performa
Hi Ed,
> I am running into a roadblock getting PF to filter traffic on
> a Netgraph interface representing an L2TP/IPSec connection.
> The problem I have is that PF only sees traffic on the outbound
> side of the netgraph interface.
This happens because the L2TP packets are tagged with an IPSEC-
On Jan 23, 2012, at 11:17 PM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> On 23.01.2012 16:01, Nikolay Denev wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 20, 2012, at 10:32 AM, Nikolay Denev wrote:
>>
>>> On Jan 15, 2012, at 9:52 PM, Nikolay Denev wrote:
>>>
On 15.01.2012, at 21:35, Andrey Zonov wrote:
> This helped me:
On Jan 23, 2012, at 11:39 PM, Marcin Markowski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This message has been sent to freebsd-performance@ but got
> the information that should contact also with freebsd-net@.
>
> We use FreeBSD as sniffer (libpcap programs) and we experience
> performance problems when incoming traf
13 matches
Mail list logo
