On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 06:09:30AM +0900, rozhuk...@gmail.com wrote: r> I found a comment in the code: r> /* r> * This node has all kinds of stuff that could be screwed by SMP. r> * Until it gets it's own internal protection, we go through in r> * single file. This could hurt a machine bridging beteen two r> * GB ethernets so it should be fixed. r> * When it's fixed the process SHOULD NOT SLEEP, spinlocks please! r> * (and atomic ops ) r> */ r> r> mtx_init(...., MTX_DEF); r> How bad to use netgraph node MTX_DEF mutex?
It would be correct to use MTX_DEF mutex to lock the ng_bridge node. You need smth like a mutex per hash entry, and if all done correctly, then you can remove NG_NODE_FORCE_WRITER(). -- Totus tuus, Glebius. _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
