Re: Too much interrupts on ixgbe

Arnaud Lacombe-6 wrote: > > Hi, > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Ryan Stone wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Sergey Saley wrote: >>> MPD5, netgraph, pppoe.Types of traffic - any (customer traffic). >>> Bying this card I counted on a 3-4G traffic at 3-4K pp

Re: Too much interrupts on ixgbe

Hi, On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Ryan Stone wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Sergey Saley wrote: >> MPD5, netgraph, pppoe.Types of traffic - any (customer traffic). >> Bying this card I counted on a 3-4G traffic at 3-4K pppoe sessions. >> It turned to 600-700Mbit/s, about 50K pps at

Re: Call for testers : ALi/ULi M5261/M5263 ethernet controller

On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 05:22:13PM -0700, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > Hi, > > If you have ALi/ULi M5261/M5263 ethernet controller please try the > patch at the following URL and let me know how it works. > http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/dc/dc.uli562x.diff > > The patch was generated against lates

Re: Too much interrupts on ixgbe

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Sergey Saley wrote: > MPD5, netgraph, pppoe.Types of traffic - any (customer traffic). > Bying this card I counted on a 3-4G traffic at 3-4K pppoe sessions. > It turned to 600-700Mbit/s, about 50K pps at 700-800 pppoe sessions. PPPoE is your problem. The Intel ca

Re: Too much interrupts on ixgbe

You could try this patch. It disables the interrupt while it's being handled. (The driver already re-enables it at the end of the handler and the task.) -Andrew Index: sys/dev/ixgbe/ixgbe.c === --- sys/dev/ixgbe/ixgbe.c (rev

Re: Too much interrupts on ixgbe

Ryan Stone-2 wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Sergey Saley wrote: >> Nothing has changed after increasing mbufs count increasing: >> >> irq256: ix0:que 0                3013004       2431 >> irq257: ix0:que 1                 970295        783 >> irq258: ix0:que 2        

Re: Too much interrupts on ixgbe

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Sergey Saley wrote: > Nothing has changed after increasing mbufs count increasing: > > irq256: ix0:que 0                3013004       2431 > irq257: ix0:que 1                 970295        783 > irq258: ix0:que 2                 574782        463 > irq259: ix0:que

Re: Too much interrupts on ixgbe

Jack Vogel wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Sergey Saley wrote: > >> >> Jack Vogel wrote: >> > >> > You need to increase your mbuf pool, note below in your messages where >> it >> > has >> > insufficient to configure for ix1, I don't know that this will change >> the >>

Re: Possible sge(4)/atphy(4) regression on RELENG_9?

On Oct 24, 2011, at 8:52 PM, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 04:43:57PM +0300, Nikolay Denev wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I've recently upgraded a box running RELENG_8 to RELENG_9 and immediately I >> noticed much slower network connection. >> Running iperf shows about 20-30Mbits whic

Re: Too much interrupts on ixgbe

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Sergey Saley wrote: > > Jack Vogel wrote: > > > > You need to increase your mbuf pool, note below in your messages where it > > has > > insufficient to configure for ix1, I don't know that this will change the > > interrupt > > difference but it should be addresse

Re: Possible sge(4)/atphy(4) regression on RELENG_9?

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 04:43:57PM +0300, Nikolay Denev wrote: > Hello, > > I've recently upgraded a box running RELENG_8 to RELENG_9 and immediately I > noticed much slower network connection. > Running iperf shows about 20-30Mbits which was almost full GigE (~900Mbits) > speed before. > > I'm

Re: Too much interrupts on ixgbe

Jack Vogel wrote: > > You need to increase your mbuf pool, note below in your messages where it > has > insufficient to configure for ix1, I don't know that this will change the > interrupt > difference but it should be addressed anyway. > Thank You for answer! Nobody's fault but mine :-( Being

Re: Too much interrupts on ixgbe

You need to increase your mbuf pool, note below in your messages where it has insufficient to configure for ix1, I don't know that this will change the interrupt difference but it should be addressed anyway. I also noticed that you have the adapter in a PCIE 1.0 slot (only 2.5 Gb/s), that will lim

Re: IPFW shows me Strangeness in fresh 8.2-RELEASE system

On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 5:31 PM, David DeSimone wrote: > Ethernet cards filter their traffic based on MAC address, not based on > IP address. > > Use tcpdump -e to examine the destination MAC of the packets you are > receiving, in order to determine whether you should receive them. tcpdump -pe, l

Possible sge(4)/atphy(4) regression on RELENG_9?

Hello, I've recently upgraded a box running RELENG_8 to RELENG_9 and immediately I noticed much slower network connection. Running iperf shows about 20-30Mbits which was almost full GigE (~900Mbits) speed before. I'm noticing interface errors : [16:37]ndenev@nas:~% netstat -I sge0 NameMtu

Re: 9.0-RC1 panic in tcp_input: negative winow.

On Sunday, October 23, 2011 11:58:28 am Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 11:44:45AM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 08:10:38AM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > > > My suggestion would be that if we won't be able to fix it before 9.0, > > > we should

Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org

Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker

Too much interrupts on ixgbe

There is my FreeBSD box: kernel --- # # GENERIC -- Generic kernel configuration file for FreeBSD/i386 # # For more information on this file, please read the config(5) manual page, # and/or the handbook section on Kernel Configuration Files: # # http://www.FreeBSD.org/doc/en_US.ISO88