Hi!
I'm trying to configure carp over lagg on 8.2-RELEASE. I've configured
lagg0:
lagg0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
options=209b
ether 00:30:48:5b:cb:5a
inet 10.0.0.131 netmask 0xffc0 broadcast 10.0.0.191
media: Ethernet autoselect
status: active
On 9/14/11 1:33 AM, Vladimir Budnev wrote:
Hello list
I am not sure which list this question must go to, so I am sending
to -net and -ipfw lists.
We have faced some strange problem with ipfw behavior, which we
can't understand ourselves. An it really hurts:(
We are running 7.2-RELEASE.
I'
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 7:40 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> You should probably commit that.
I've been meaning to post it to -current to see if somebody could come
up with a better approach to solving the problem, but if you're happy
with it, I'll submit it to re@.
> I wonder if it should be a KASSER
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 7:40 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> You should probably commit that.
I've been meaning to post it to -current to see if somebody could come
up with a better approach to solving the problem, but if you're happy
with it, I'll submit it to re@.
> I wonder if it should be a KASSER
On 9/14/11 5:56 AM, jyl_2006 wrote:
Before testing cmt in wlan,we also turn on sysctl states by setting
sysctl net.inet.sctp.cmt_pf=1
sysctl net.inet.sctp.cmt_use_dac=1
sysctl net.inet.sctp.cmt_on_off=1
My Os is Freebsd8.2, I write a simple tarball to send data , and get data
from wireshark .
On Wednesday, September 14, 2011 9:15:38 am Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 14 September 2011 19:40, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> > You should probably commit that. I wonder if it should be a KASSERT() also
> > so
> > that it outright panics on a kernel with INVARIANTS enabled so developers
> > will
> > g
On Sep 14, 2011, at 2:56 PM, jyl_2006 wrote:
> Before testing cmt in wlan,we also turn on sysctl states by setting
> sysctl net.inet.sctp.cmt_pf=1
> sysctl net.inet.sctp.cmt_use_dac=1
> sysctl net.inet.sctp.cmt_on_off=1
>
> My Os is Freebsd8.2, I write a simple tarball to send data , and ge
On 14 September 2011 19:40, John Baldwin wrote:
> You should probably commit that. I wonder if it should be a KASSERT() also so
> that it outright panics on a kernel with INVARIANTS enabled so developers will
> go fix their code as it seems to me to likely be a bug to enqueue a task that
> many
Before testing cmt in wlan,we also turn on sysctl states by setting
sysctl net.inet.sctp.cmt_pf=1
sysctl net.inet.sctp.cmt_use_dac=1
sysctl net.inet.sctp.cmt_on_off=1
My Os is Freebsd8.2, I write a simple tarball to send data , and get data
from wireshark .
The result shows that both two pat
On Tuesday, September 13, 2011 6:29:05 pm Ryan Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> > It did not crash, yet. The only downside is that after 3h30 and ~4h,
> > igb(4) queues' handler started spinning infinitely, breaking network
> > connectivity.
>
> I saw a simi
>
> 14.09.2011 15:33, Vladimir Budnev пишет:
>
> > So i think there are at least to questions:
> >
> > 1. Have anyone ever met such situation? Or may be something close to
> > this one with 'hidden' ipfw rules?
>
> Have you tried "ipfw -d -e show"?
>
>
Nope we didnt check those tables. But to be ho
14.09.2011 15:33, Vladimir Budnev пишет:
> So i think there are at least to questions:
>
> 1. Have anyone ever met such situation? Or may be something close to
> this one with 'hidden' ipfw rules?
Have you tried "ipfw -d -e show"?
Eugene Grosbein
___
Typo:
mustbe: We'v noticed that no packets from specific ip(10.10.122.23/32 )
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hello list
I am not sure which list this question must go to, so I am sending to
-net and -ipfw lists.
We have faced some strange problem with ipfw behavior, which we can't
understand ourselves. An it really hurts:(
We are running 7.2-RELEASE.
I'll try to describe the problem as we observe
14 matches
Mail list logo
