hi,
i want to setup a router-box with freebsd 8.0. with four Intel Pro/1000 NICs.
the network i'm using router for, is a large and complicated network with high
traffic almost all the time (up to 800Mbps for each of 4 NICs). and route
table
may get large. so these are my questions:
1- first,
> > Are you sure isc-dhcp doesn't support stateless? I was able to get it
> > working by creating subnet6 entries in dhcpd6.conf and telling rtadvd
> > to operate in other-stateful configuration mode (raflags="o"). At that
> > point, stateless autoconfiguration worked and the clients did a DHCP
> >
Hello, Michael.
You wrote 21 апреля 2011 г., 2:55:15:
> Are you sure isc-dhcp doesn't support stateless? I was able to get it
> working by creating subnet6 entries in dhcpd6.conf and telling rtadvd
> to operate in other-stateful configuration mode (raflags="o"). At that
> point, stateless autoconf
2011/4/20 Lev Serebryakov :
> Hello, Freebsd-net.
>
> Is here any stateless dhcp6 solution for FreeBSD?
>
> isc-dhcp 4.1 seems to not support statless mode by server
>
> dibbler is not ported to FreeBSD.
>
> dhcp6s (WIDE-dhcpd) works only with one interface... It is possible,
> of course, to r
Hello, Freebsd-net.
Is here any stateless dhcp6 solution for FreeBSD?
isc-dhcp 4.1 seems to not support statless mode by server
dibbler is not ported to FreeBSD.
dhcp6s (WIDE-dhcpd) works only with one interface... It is possible,
of course, to run multiple instances of dhcp6s for mult
Old Synopsis: Marvell Yukon 2 device works only few seconds
New Synopsis: [msk] Marvell Yukon 2 device works only few seconds
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Apr 20 22:28:37 UTC 2011
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:54:31AM +0100, Paul Thornton wrote:
> On 19/04/2011 23:09, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> > Here is experimental patch for BCM57765 family controllers. I
> > don't have these controllers so the patch was not tested at all
> > except compile. Recent Broadcom controllers like BCM5
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 04:21:28PM +0100, Paul Thornton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 20/04/2011 14:44, Marius Strobl wrote:
> > Hrm, looks like neither NetBSD nor OpenBSD support this variant so
> > far, however Linux also doesn't seem to have special handling for it.
> > Could you please give the attached
The following reply was made to PR kern/156408; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Thomas Johnson
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, t...@claimlynx.com
Cc:
Subject: re: kern/156408: [vlan] Routing failure when using VLANs vs. Physical
ethernet interfaces.
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:21:27 -0500
--20
Hi,
On 20/04/2011 14:44, Marius Strobl wrote:
> Hrm, looks like neither NetBSD nor OpenBSD support this variant so
> far, however Linux also doesn't seem to have special handling for it.
> Could you please give the attached patch in addition to the existing
> one a try?
I've added your patch to b
Seems there's an issue with the intel ix driver which causes
it to bin connections when you manipulate ip aliases.
This causes issues on boot when jails start as it bins other
active sessions.
Is this a know issue?
Running 8.2-RELEASE amd64 here.
Regards
Steve
==
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 02:22:47PM +0100, Paul Thornton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 20/04/2011 14:16, Marius Strobl wrote:
> > Looks like brgphy(4) also needs to be taught about this hardware. Could
> > you please provide the corresponding part of a verbose dmesg?
>
> Hopefully this covers everything tha
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:54:31AM +0100, Paul Thornton wrote:
> bge0: mem
> 0x9310-0x9310,0x9311-0x9311 irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci4
> bge0: CHIP ID 0x57785000; ASIC REV 0x57785; CHIP REV 0x577850; PCI-E
> miibus0: on bge0
> ukphy0: PHY 1 on miibus0
> ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-
Hi,
On 20/04/2011 14:16, Marius Strobl wrote:
> Looks like brgphy(4) also needs to be taught about this hardware. Could
> you please provide the corresponding part of a verbose dmesg?
Hopefully this covers everything that you might need:
pcib4: slot 0 INTA is routed to irq 18
found-> vendor=0x14
Hello,
The sys/net/radix.c refuses to add 0.0.0.0 address to the tree,
but allows to add 0.0.0.0/32 address (when mask is specified).
The question. Is it not allowed to give address with all zeroes
to radix.c or is there some mistake in the radix.c code?
How to check:
Create file, say, zero-ex
Hello, Bug-followup.
It is still valid for 8.2-STABLE:
gateway# ipfw add 5 allow ipv6-icmp from any to
2001:470:1f09:::/64,2001:470::1::/64,2001:470::2::/64 icmp6types
1,2,3,4,128,129 keep-state
ipfw: bad netmask ``470:1f09:::/64''
gateway# uname -a
FreeBSD gateway.home.se
On 19/04/2011 23:09, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> Here is experimental patch for BCM57765 family controllers. I
> don't have these controllers so the patch was not tested at all
> except compile. Recent Broadcom controllers like BCM57765 support
> EEE(Energy Efficient Ethernet) feature but it is not yet
17 matches
Mail list logo
