Re: if_run and wlan_amrr: kernel panics on 8.2-PRERELEASE amd64

2011-01-18 Thread Alexander Zagrebin
Hi! On 18.01.2011 12:31:20 +0100, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > > I'm trying to use the RT2872-based USB adapter in the hostap mode > > on the latest RELENG_8 (8.2-PRERELEASE) for amd64. > > [..] > > Pull that > http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?view=revision&revision=217511 > and let me know if th

strange netstat -ian output

2011-01-18 Thread Bernd Walter
A given interface is configured: re0: flags=8a43 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=399b ether 00:01:08:00:79:92 inet 10.1.1.15 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 10.1.1.255 inet6 fe80::201:8ff:fe00:7992%re0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet6 2a02:21e0:16e0:2000::103 prefixl

Re: kern/154123: [bge] bge driver problems BCM5906 laptop

2011-01-18 Thread yongari
Synopsis: [bge] bge driver problems BCM5906 laptop State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: yongari State-Changed-When: Tue Jan 18 21:01:07 UTC 2011 State-Changed-Why: Would you show me both dmeg and "pciconf -lcbv" output? ifconfig bge0 output also would be helpful. Responsible-

Re: kern/153454: [patch] [wlan] [urtw] Support ad-hoc and hostap modes in if_urtw(4)

2011-01-18 Thread Eugene Grosbein
The following reply was made to PR kern/153454; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Eugene Grosbein To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Cc: weongyo.je...@gmail.com Subject: Re: kern/153454: [patch] [wlan] [urtw] Support ad-hoc and hostap modes in if_urtw(4) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 02:21:43 +0600 On 19.0

Re: kern/154123: [bge] bge driver problems BCM5906 laptop

2011-01-18 Thread linimon
Old Synopsis: bge driver problems BCM5906 laptop New Synopsis: [bge] bge driver problems BCM5906 laptop Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Jan 18 20:36:26 UTC 2011 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to maintainer(s). ht

Re: kern/154076: [alc] [hang] recent alc driver locks computer

2011-01-18 Thread yongari
Synopsis: [alc] [hang] recent alc driver locks computer Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->yongari Responsible-Changed-By: yongari Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Jan 18 20:08:26 UTC 2011 Responsible-Changed-Why: Grab. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=154076 __

Re: CFT/CFR, possible fix for ifconfig scan hang

2011-01-18 Thread Weongyo Jeong
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 12:17:17AM +0600, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > On 28.12.2010 22:58, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > > On Tuesday 28 December 2010 17:30:58 you wrote: > >> On 28.12.2010 01:24, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > >>> I have a patch available which addresses both of the issues. It requests > >>>

Re: kern/153454: [patch] [wlan] [urtw] Support ad-hoc and hostap modes in if_urtw(4)

2011-01-18 Thread Weongyo Jeong
The following reply was made to PR kern/153454; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Weongyo Jeong To: Eugene Grosbein Cc: freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/153454: [patch] [wlan] [urtw] Support ad-hoc and hostap modes in if_urtw(4) Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:16:30 -0800 On Mon,

Re: bogus 0 len IP packet, was: Hang in VOP_LOCK1_APV on 8-STABLE with NFS.

2011-01-18 Thread sthaug
> > I'm seeing the same problem with Broadcom NetXtreme (bce) cards: > > > > bce0@pci0:3:0:0:class=0x02 card=0x03421014 chip=0x164c14e4 > > rev=0x12 hdr=0x00 > > vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation' > > device = 'Broadcom NetXtreme II Gigabit Ethernet Adapter (BCM5708)' > >

Re: bogus 0 len IP packet, was: Hang in VOP_LOCK1_APV on 8-STABLE with NFS.

2011-01-18 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 09:38:04AM +0100, sth...@nethelp.no wrote: > > > So, does anyone have an idea why the IP length field would be set to 0 > > > for these TCP/IP packets? > > > > > > Here's some info from Ronald w.r.t. his hardware. (All I can think of is > > > that he could try disabling TSO

Re: RESOLVED: Re: 8.1 Box does not react on ICMP "unreachable - need to frag"

2011-01-18 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Jan 18, 2011, at 6:14 AM, Axel Rau wrote: > Am 18.01.2011 um 14:40 schrieb Artyom Viklenko: >> Make sure DB2 got ICMP need-frag message and it not blocked. >> Also, check sysctl variable 'net.inet.tcp.path_mtu_discovery'. > > Yes to both. So this is a bug in 8.1? If DF is true and the packet e

Re: kern/154091: [netgraph] [panic] netgraph, unaligned mbuf?

2011-01-18 Thread linimon
Old Synopsis: Panic: netgraph, unaligned mbuf? New Synopsis: [netgraph] [panic] netgraph, unaligned mbuf? Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Jan 18 17:57:32 UTC 2011 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to maintainer(s).

Re: sis(4) broken on 8.2 [Re: Carp seems completely broken on 8.2-RC2 and 8.2-PRERELEASE]

2011-01-18 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 03:37:48AM +0100, Paul Schenkeveld wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 02:26:24PM -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > > Since you didn't post dmesg output I'm not sure what kind of > > > controller you have but I guess it would be NS8381[56]. I > > > overhauled sis(4)

mpd5 as l2tp mlppp server

2011-01-18 Thread Joe Holden
Hi guys, Has any successfully used mpd5 with l2tp and done mlppp over it? Multilink never seems to be enabled, I have multilink enabled on the link, however the status always remains Inactive Thanks, J ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http:/

Re: Netgraph/mpd5 stability issues

2011-01-18 Thread Mike Tancsa
On 1/17/2011 11:14 AM, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > On 17.01.2011 17:41, Mike Tancsa wrote: > I also have stability issues on RELENG_8. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=153497 >>> >>> Do you change net.isr.direct from default 1 to 0 for your box? >> >> No, I leave it at 1 >> >

Re: kern/152853: [em] tftpd (and likely other udp traffic) fails over em(4) unless rxcsum/txcsum disabled

2011-01-18 Thread Eugene Grosbein
The following reply was made to PR kern/152853; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Eugene Grosbein To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Cc: Jack F Vogel , n...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/152853: [em] tftpd (and likely other udp traffic) fails over em(4) unless rxcsum/txcsum disabled Date: Tue, 18 Jan

Re: kern/152853: [em] tftpd (and likely other udp traffic) fails over em(4) unless rxcsum/txcsum disabled

2011-01-18 Thread Eugene Grosbein
Hi! 7.4-PRERELEASE is affected too. In short, tftp is broken in recent em(4) driver in all branches due to this bug. 8.1-RELEASE is not affected, 7.3 is fine too. Eugene Grosbein ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman

Re: kern/152853: [em] tftpd (and likely other udp traffic) fails over em(4) unless rxcsum/txcsum disabled

2011-01-18 Thread Petr Lampa
The following reply was made to PR kern/152853; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Petr Lampa To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, mandr...@bit0.com Cc: j...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/152853: [em] tftpd (and likely other udp traffic) fails over em(4) unless rxcsum/txcsum disabled Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2

Re: Bug in ieee80211_mesh.c code?

2011-01-18 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
On Monday, January 17, 2011 19:06:39 Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote: > Hi, > > This line 1466 in ieee80211_mesh.c: > frm += frm[2] + 2; > > When I look at the other modes it should be > frm += frm[1] + 2; Seems indeed to be incorrect, after frm += frm[2] + 2, frm will point anywhere but definitely n

Re: RESOLVED: Re: 8.1 Box does not react on ICMP "unreachable - need to frag"

2011-01-18 Thread Axel Rau
Am 18.01.2011 um 14:40 schrieb Artyom Viklenko: Make sure DB2 got ICMP need-frag message and it not blocked. Also, check sysctl variable 'net.inet.tcp.path_mtu_discovery'. Yes to both. So this is a bug in 8.1? Axel --- axel@chaos1.de PGP-Key:29E99DD6 +49 151 2300 9283 computing @ cha

Re: RESOLVED: Re: 8.1 Box does not react on ICMP "unreachable - need to frag"

2011-01-18 Thread Artyom Viklenko
18.01.2011 14:23, Axel Rau пишет: Am 18.01.2011 um 11:00 schrieb Axel Rau: The DB server returns its query results successfully until an oversized message is being sent (with "DF" set), which the GW2 refuses with an ICMP "unreachable - need to frag (mtu 1492) I could convince the firewall to

RESOLVED: Re: 8.1 Box does not react on ICMP "unreachable - need to frag"

2011-01-18 Thread Axel Rau
Am 18.01.2011 um 11:00 schrieb Axel Rau: The DB server returns its query results successfully until an oversized message is being sent (with "DF" set), which the GW2 refuses with an ICMP "unreachable - need to frag (mtu 1492) I could convince the firewall to defragment the packet itself. (-

Re: if_run and wlan_amrr: kernel panics on 8.2-PRERELEASE amd64

2011-01-18 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
On Tuesday, January 18, 2011 11:26:58 Alexander Zagrebin wrote: > Hi! > > I'm trying to use the RT2872-based USB adapter in the hostap mode > on the latest RELENG_8 (8.2-PRERELEASE) for amd64. > [..] Pull that http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?view=revision&revision=217511 and let me know if tha

if_run and wlan_amrr: kernel panics on 8.2-PRERELEASE amd64

2011-01-18 Thread Alexander Zagrebin
Hi! I'm trying to use the RT2872-based USB adapter in the hostap mode on the latest RELENG_8 (8.2-PRERELEASE) for amd64. The kernel hasn't wlan support compiled in, so I've added if_run_load="YES" runfw_load="YES" wlan_amrr_load="YES" into the /boot/loader.conf With this changes the kernel pani

8.1 Box does not react on ICMP "unreachable - need to frag"

2011-01-18 Thread Axel Rau
Hi, DB2 is a DB server with fbsd 8.1-REL. The SQL query comes in through 2 Obsd 4.8 firewalls(GW2). The DB server returns its query results successfully until an oversized message is being sent (with "DF" set), which the GW2 refuses with an ICMP "unreachable - need to frag (mtu 1492)": DB2

Re: bogus 0 len IP packet, was: Hang in VOP_LOCK1_APV on 8-STABLE with NFS.

2011-01-18 Thread sthaug
> > So, does anyone have an idea why the IP length field would be set to 0 > > for these TCP/IP packets? > > > > Here's some info from Ronald w.r.t. his hardware. (All I can think of is > > that he could try disabling TSO, etc?) > > > > Thanks in advance for any help with this, rick > > > > It