2009/4/23 Robert Watson :
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, pluknet wrote:
>
>> Please, give me comment on this. The panic is on 6.2-REL. Is it known to
>> be fixed in the latter releases?
>
> It may well be -- there have been quite significant architectural
> improvements to socket life cycle (etc) between 6
I started playing with IPv6 on my home network with the intent to
transition over. While many things work quite well, IPv6 technology in
general still seems to have some rough edges.
In terms of FreeBSD support, rtadvd and rtsol do not yet support
(easily? -O option in rtadvd/rtsold) RFC5006
Hi John,
Just wanted you to know that yesterday I joined Socialmoto.
Actually I keep on travelling and thus like making friends from
different places so that i can know more about places and I can feel
comfortable on unknown places because of known friends, but it gonna
b
On 2009.04.21 23:16:58 -0600, Will Andrews wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've written a patch (against 8.0-CURRENT as of r191369) which makes
> it possible to build, load, run, & unload CARP as a module, using the
> GENERIC kernel. It can be obtained from:
>
> http://firepipe.net/patches/carp-as-module-20
2009/4/23 Ed Maste :
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 11:05:00AM +, Andrew Brampton wrote:
>
>> 2009/3/27 Luigi Rizzo :
>> > The load of polling is pretty low (within 1% or so) even with
>> > polling. The advantage of having interrupts is faster response
>> > to incoming traffic, not CPU load.
>>
>> o
The following reply was made to PR kern/132734; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Robert Watson
To: Mikolaj Golub
Cc: Alexey Illarionov , bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/132734: panic in net/if_mib.c
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:33:43 +0100 (BST)
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Mikolaj Golub wrot
The following reply was made to PR kern/132734; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Mikolaj Golub
To: Alexey Illarionov
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, Robert Watson
Subject: Re: kern/132734: panic in net/if_mib.c
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 22:29:36 +0300
SVN rev 191435 on 2009-04-23 18:23:08Z by rwa
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 11:05:00AM +, Andrew Brampton wrote:
> 2009/3/27 Luigi Rizzo :
> > The load of polling is pretty low (within 1% or so) even with
> > polling. The advantage of having interrupts is faster response
> > to incoming traffic, not CPU load.
>
> oh, I was under the impression
Daniel Dias Gonçalves wrote:
Hi,
My system is a FreeBSD 7.1R.
When I add rules IPFW COUNT to 254 IPS from my network, one of my
interfaces increases the latency, causing large delays in the network,
when I delete COUNT rules, everything returns to normal, which can be ?
My script:
of cours
In response to Daniel Dias Gonçalves :
>
> My system is a FreeBSD 7.1R.
> When I add rules IPFW COUNT to 254 IPS from my network, one of my
> interfaces increases the latency, causing large delays in the network,
> when I delete COUNT rules, everything returns to normal, which can be ?
Not sure
I have asked Leonardo to provide more info and backtrace.
So here is backtrace:
cobra4# kgdb /boot/kernel/kernel.symbols /var/crash/vmcore.0
[GDB will not be able to debug user-mode threads:
/usr/lib/libthread_db.so: Undefined symbol "ps_pglobal_lookup"]
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
Copyright 2004 Fre
The following reply was made to PR kern/133902; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Mikolaj Golub
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc: freebsd-b...@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org, lsantagost...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: kern/133902: [tun] Killing tun0 iface ssh tunnel causes Panic
String: page fau
Hi,
My system is a FreeBSD 7.1R.
When I add rules IPFW COUNT to 254 IPS from my network, one of my
interfaces increases the latency, causing large delays in the network,
when I delete COUNT rules, everything returns to normal, which can be ?
My script:
ipcount.php
-- CUT --
sy
Hi,
I'm trying to setup an proxy arp on a dual homed host.
I noticed that I cannot set it up on 8.0-current the same way as I
could on 6.2; hence the question: have the setup procedure changed
recently (when the arp table was separated from the routing table,
maybe?)? My 8.0-current is from 2009
--- On Thu, 4/23/09, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> From: Peter Jeremy
> Subject: Re: Network Card
> To: "Barney Cordoba"
> Cc: "ovi freebsd" , freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Date: Thursday, April 23, 2009, 2:28 AM
> On 2009-Apr-21 14:02:38 -0700, Barney Cordoba
> wrote:
> >On all of the MBs that I have
The following reply was made to PR kern/131153; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Adam K Kirchhoff
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, ad...@voicenet.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/131153: [iwi] iwi doesn't see a wireless network
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 06:31:56 -0400
Can anyone at least confirm that the
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, pluknet wrote:
Please, give me comment on this. The panic is on 6.2-REL. Is it known to be
fixed in the latter releases?
It may well be -- there have been quite significant architectural improvements
to socket life cycle (etc) between 6.2 and 7.x releases, which may well
Hi all.
Please, give me comment on this.
The panic is on 6.2-REL. Is it known to be fixed in the latter releases?
Thanks.
db> bt
Tracing pid 14677 tid 101677 td 0xcf8e2640
_mtx_lock_sleep(ce7b9a30,cf8e2640,0,0,0) at _mtx_lock_sleep+0x9d
soabort(ce7b99bc) at soabort+0x82
soclose(c83a2858) at socl
18 matches
Mail list logo
