Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, Eugene M. Kim wrote:
> > A quick question: Is bridge(4) supposed /not/ to automatically configure an
> > IPv6 link-local address?
>
> yes there is a check for this in the code and if remoed (tried that
> lately) more things go wrong.
>
> > I'm trying
The following reply was made to PR kern/133572; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Max Laier
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org,
dennis.melent...@gmail.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/133572: [ppp] [hang] incoming PPTP connection hangs the system
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 23:47:55 +0100
Is it possible for y
Old Synopsis: incoming PPTP connection hangs the system
New Synopsis: [ppp] [hang] incoming PPTP connection hangs the system
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Apr 10 21:11:38 UTC 2009
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over
The following reply was made to PR kern/129580; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Glen Barber
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: misc/129580: Netgear WG311v3 (ndis) causes kenel trap at boot.
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 16:04:33 -0400
Since malo(4) is available, I believe this PR can be
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, Karim Fodil-Lemelin wrote:
Thank you for the answer, clear and concise. I asked the question because I
had modified pf_get_mtag() to use uma directly in the hope that it would be
faster then calling malloc. But since pf_mtag is 20bytes, malloc will end up
using a fixed 32b
Robert Watson wrote:
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, Karim Fodil-Lemelin wrote:
Is there any plans on getting the mbuf tags sub-system integrated
with the universal memory allocator? Getting tags for mbufs is still
calling malloc in uipc_mbuf.c ... What would be the benefits of using
uma instead?
Hi K
The following reply was made to PR kern/131310; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: dfil...@freebsd.org (dfilter service)
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/131310: commit references a PR
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:16:29 + (UTC)
Author: mlaier
Date: Fri Apr 10 19:16:14 2009
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, Karim Fodil-Lemelin wrote:
Is there any plans on getting the mbuf tags sub-system integrated with the
universal memory allocator? Getting tags for mbufs is still calling malloc
in uipc_mbuf.c ... What would be the benefits of using uma instead?
Hi Karim:
Right now there
Sam Leffler wrote:
Sam Leffler wrote:
Boris Kochergin wrote:
Ahoy. I'm having trouble with multiple hostap-mode wlan
pseudo-devices. The machine is an 8-CURRENT from yesterday:
# uname -a
FreeBSD test 8.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT #0: Tue Apr 7 16:54:56
UTC 2009 r...@test:/usr/obj/usr
Hello,
Is there any plans on getting the mbuf tags sub-system integrated with
the universal memory allocator? Getting tags for mbufs is still calling
malloc in uipc_mbuf.c ... What would be the benefits of using uma instead?
Karim.
___
freebsd-net@f
The following reply was made to PR kern/131310; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: dfil...@freebsd.org (dfilter service)
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/131310: commit references a PR
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:42:02 + (UTC)
Author: mlaier
Date: Fri Apr 10 14:41:51 2009
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
I changed it, and that worked like a dream. Now I get basically the
same throughput with IPv4 and IPv6. There are of course still issues
like lots of IPv6 tunnels that add extra latency - but that's not the
fault of FreeBSD.
Anyway, thanks for your w
The following reply was made to PR kern/131310; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Mikolaj Golub
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org,Vitaly Dodonov
Cc: Semenchuk Oleg
Subject: Re: kern/131310: [netgraph] [panic] 7.1 panics with mpd netgraph
interface changes
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 15:09:38 +0300
Thi
Hello, i did sent this mine message to stable mail list, then i found that
your address is a manteiner for some bugs.
I'm asking if this one article:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=129352
Has updates, since i haven't found any new, 'cause it's talking about
PRERELEASE and i'm workin
14 matches
Mail list logo
