At 18 Feb 2008 21:55:50 +, Nick Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
At 2008-02-18 21:36:18+, Bill Moran writes:
In response to Nick Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I have a multi-home host: more than one IP address. The addresses
are
in separate subnets but run over the same etherne
Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
In summary, favor wired connectivity over the wireless one, at any time:
could this be at boot time or not.
I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one who wants this kind of setup. So
how did you achieve this setup?
The forwarding code needs to be changed to support the notion
Sorry pl ignore this - replied to the wrong message... Blackberry buttons are
too small for me :-)
- Original Message -
From: Leonid Grossman
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
Cc: 'freebsd-net@freebsd.org'
Sent: Tue Feb 19 19:57:58 200
Pl forward him my original e-mail, it is all I got. Last event was not useful,
but who knows...
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: John Hay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Sent: Tue Feb 19 17:13:34 2008
Subject: Re: traceroute AS path pat
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 08:49:29PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 11:51:21AM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 02:13:15AM +, Thomas Hurst wrote:
> > > * Pyun YongHyeon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > >
> > > > I thought nsphyter(4) may handl
On Feb 20, 2008 12:16 AM, Jeremie Le Hen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I have two network interfaces that share the same IP address. I would
> like tochange the default route's interface when the link changes. I
> think it could be possible to hack up something with devd(8) or
> net/i
Hi list,
I have two network interfaces that share the same IP address. I would
like tochange the default route's interface when the link changes. I
think it could be possible to hack up something with devd(8) or
net/ifstated, but this would be quite ugly.
FWIW, I have a wired (bge0) and a wirel
On Feb 18, 2008, at 10:41 AM, John Hay wrote:
Hi Rui,
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 09:30:44PM +, Rui Paulo wrote:
Hi,
The attached patch ports a traceroute functionality from FreeBSD
called AS path.
The concept is simple. On each hop we query a whois server to find
the
corresponding hop AS
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 11:51:21AM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 02:13:15AM +, Thomas Hurst wrote:
> > * Pyun YongHyeon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> > > I thought nsphyter(4) may handle PHY hardware but ukphy(4) was used.
> > > Just curious, would you let me kn
Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
Tom Judge wrote:
However FreeBSD's routing table does not currently support policy
routing without some help from the firewall. The only way to achieve
your goal is to use one of the firewalls (pf/ipfw/ipf) to do the
policy routing for you.
If anyone wants to take
Rui Paulo escreveu:
On Feb 18, 2008, at 12:22 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
From: Rui Paulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:25:58 +
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Feb 17, 2008, at 9:30 PM, Rui Paulo wrote:
Hi,
The attached patch ports a traceroute functionality from FreeBSD
call
On Feb 18, 2008, at 12:22 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
From: Rui Paulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:25:58 +
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Feb 17, 2008, at 9:30 PM, Rui Paulo wrote:
Hi,
The attached patch ports a traceroute functionality from FreeBSD
called AS path.
I mean,
On Feb 18, 2008, at 12:55 AM, Steven Hartland wrote:
Sounds like a really nice feature!
What version is this a patch against, fails totally on 6.2 here.
It's against CURRENT.
Regards.
--
Rui Paulo
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://l
On Feb 18, 2008, at 12:17 AM, Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
Rui Paulo wrote:
On Feb 17, 2008, at 9:30 PM, Rui Paulo wrote:
Hi,
The attached patch ports a traceroute functionality from FreeBSD
called AS path.
I mean, "ported from NetBSD".
AS lookup is already in the NANOG traceroute in ports
At Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:00:56 +,
Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
>
> Rob Watt wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > We recently upgraded some of our machines to 6.3-RELEASE and we have been
> > plagued by repeatable panics when our multi-cast client applications exit.
> > Our machines have Intel X5365 processors, LSI
Tom Judge wrote:
However FreeBSD's routing table does not currently support policy
routing without some help from the firewall. The only way to achieve
your goal is to use one of the firewalls (pf/ipfw/ipf) to do the
policy routing for you.
If anyone wants to take this on, start looking at
Rob Watt wrote:
Hi.
We recently upgraded some of our machines to 6.3-RELEASE and we have been
plagued by repeatable panics when our multi-cast client applications exit.
Our machines have Intel X5365 processors, LSI MegaSAS 1064R cards, and Intel
Pro 1000 MF nic cards (although we have seen this
Nick Barnes wrote:
I want packets from address A1 to be sent via gateway G1, but packets
from address A2 to be sent via gateway G2.
How do I do this? Can I just have more than one default route? I'm
remote from the machine in question, so I don't want to tinker with
the default route until I'm
[1][sign.gif]
_
You've got cash
[pxl.gif]
Greetings from [2]moneybookers.com! We would like to inform you that
you have received a payment from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[3][logo.gif]
[
19 matches
Mail list logo
