On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 08:49:29PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: > On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 11:51:21AM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 02:13:15AM +0000, Thomas Hurst wrote: > > > * Pyun YongHyeon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > > > > I thought nsphyter(4) may handle PHY hardware but ukphy(4) was used. > > > > Just curious, would you let me know OUI/MII model/revision number of > > > > PHY?(ukphy(4) prints that information in verbosed boot.) > > > > > > ukphy0: <Generic IEEE 802.3u media interface> PHY 0 on miibus0 > > > ukphy0: OUI 0x080017, model 0x0002, rev. 1 > > > ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto > > > ukphy1: <Generic IEEE 802.3u media interface> PHY 0 on miibus1 > > > ukphy1: OUI 0x080017, model 0x0002, rev. 1 > > > ukphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto > > > > That's odd. The OUI/Model number indicates NATSEMI(National > > Semiconductor), DP83815 PHY and nsphyter(4) should serve your PHY. > > CCed marius, the author of nsphyter(4) port, to get more information > > how this can happen. > > Easy, in an earlier mail Thomas reported that he's running > 7.0-RC2 and nsphyter(4) isn't in RELENG_7_0. :) >
Ahh, you're right. -- Regards, Pyun YongHyeon _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
