Re: ospf over IPSec

"Eric W. Bates" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi, > Has anyone successfully used OSPF over a tunnel? Just look here : http://rfc-ref.org/RFC-TEXTS/3884/ -- S> Je cherche aussi des adresses de lieux contenant des fossiles dans S> la région parisienne http://www.senat.fr/ -+- DP in

Re: net-mgmt/bsd-airtools broken not because of gcc4

On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 08:00:00AM +0300, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > Denis Barov wrote: >> Hi all! >> I found, that port net-mgmt/bsd-airtools marked as broken: >> BROKEN= Does not compile with GCC 4.2 >> but, it's not really so. It's broken after Wed Jul 11 21:25:48 2007 UTC >> commit by

Re: net-mgmt/bsd-airtools broken not because of gcc4

Denis Barov wrote: Hi all! I found, that port net-mgmt/bsd-airtools marked as broken: BROKEN= Does not compile with GCC 4.2 but, it's not really so. It's broken after Wed Jul 11 21:25:48 2007 UTC commit by [EMAIL PROTECTED], when some ioctls was deleted from kernel. For example, af

ospf over IPSec

I have to try and get OSPF working over an ESP tunnel. The idea is to allow graceful fall over between a dedicated T1 and a backup tunnel over the Internet. I just realized that without an esp0 interface in ifconfig, and without the IPSec associations accessible in the routing table, I have no

net-mgmt/bsd-airtools broken not because of gcc4

Hi all! I found, that port net-mgmt/bsd-airtools marked as broken: BROKEN= Does not compile with GCC 4.2 but, it's not really so. It's broken after Wed Jul 11 21:25:48 2007 UTC commit by [EMAIL PROTECTED], when some ioctls was deleted from kernel. For example, after patching /usr/incl

Re: [PATCH]: implementation of SIOCGIFINDEX in linuxulator

On 7 Nov 2007, at 12:32, Roman Divacky wrote: On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 11:30:34AM +, Rui Paulo wrote: On 5 Nov 2007, at 15:34, Roman Divacky wrote: hi I implemented SIOCGIFINDEX in linuxulator and I would like you to review the patch.. the implementation is trivial, just mapping it to t

Re: [PATCH]: implementation of SIOCGIFINDEX in linuxulator

On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 11:30:34AM +, Rui Paulo wrote: > > On 5 Nov 2007, at 15:34, Roman Divacky wrote: > > >hi > > > >I implemented SIOCGIFINDEX in linuxulator and I would like you > >to review the patch.. the implementation is trivial, just mapping > >it to the native fbsd call. > > > >the

Re: re0: RealTek 8168/8111B: no carrier

On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 07:14:07PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > I couldn't see guilty code. In fact I couldn't reproduce it here. > Since RTL8168/8111 has built-in crossover detection feature how about > using straight cable? Further investigation: auto-negotiation works only after 'iconfig re0

Re: [PATCH]: implementation of SIOCGIFINDEX in linuxulator

On 5 Nov 2007, at 15:34, Roman Divacky wrote: hi I implemented SIOCGIFINDEX in linuxulator and I would like you to review the patch.. the implementation is trivial, just mapping it to the native fbsd call. the patch can be found here: http://www.vlakno.cz/~rdivacky/linux_socket.patch I have

Re: Marvell chipsets on 8-CURRENT and XP x64 won't talk with one another

On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 12:14:03AM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: > Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > >On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 03:12:34PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: > > > Garrett Cooper wrote: > > > >On Oct 31, 2007, at 9:50 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > > > >>I'm running tcpdump on my Mac and I noted a l

Re: re0: RealTek 8168/8111B: no carrier

On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 10:32:04AM +0200, Alexander Shikoff wrote: > On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 04:51:34PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 09:37:08AM +0200, Alexander Shikoff wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 09:24:30AM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > > > > > # pcic

Re: re0: RealTek 8168/8111B: no carrier

On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 04:51:34PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 09:37:08AM +0200, Alexander Shikoff wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 09:24:30AM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > > > > # pciconf -lv > > > > > [...] > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:3:0:0: class=0x02 c

Re: Marvell chipsets on 8-CURRENT and XP x64 won't talk with one another

Pyun YongHyeon wrote: On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 03:12:34PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: > Garrett Cooper wrote: > >On Oct 31, 2007, at 9:50 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > >>I'm running tcpdump on my Mac and I noted a lot of 'bad checksums' > >>(0x081c was the official error in all cases), then co