Julian Elischer wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd go with 4.11 or wait the extra month or so..
That's true, but unfortunately...
a) 7-CURRENT isn't production quality, but it's getting closer all the
time.
b) I need to start work soon, sometime within the next few weeks at
the latest. I
At the moment, freebsd checks a UDP checksum in place, overwriting
whatever is there. This has a side effect of the ICMP code sending back
the first eight bytes of the UDP payload with 2 bytes different to
what that system sent.
For example:
listening on lo0, link-type NULL (BSD loopback), captu
0n Wed, May 02, 2007 at 09:48:52AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hi,
> I'm looking for a network testbench / simulator to stimulate known
> networking conditions to test out a component for a product at work.
> I was wondering if there was a network simulator a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd go with 4.11 or wait the extra month or so..
That's true, but unfortunately...
a) 7-CURRENT isn't production quality, but it's getting closer all the
time.
b) I need to start work soon, sometime within the next few weeks at the
latest. I should have thought abou
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Julian Elischer wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 3 May 2007, Marko Zec wrote:
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 23:40:35 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Chuck Swiger wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for a network testbench / simulator to s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 3 May 2007, Marko Zec wrote:
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 23:40:35 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Chuck Swiger wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for a network testbench / simulator to stimulate
known networking conditions to test
On Thu, 3 May 2007, Marko Zec wrote:
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 23:40:35 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Chuck Swiger wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for a network testbench / simulator to stimulate
known networking conditions to test out a component for a prod
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 23:40:35 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 2 May 2007, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> I'm looking for a network testbench / simulator to stimulate
> >> known networking conditions to test out a component for a product
> >> at work. I wa
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Chuck Swiger wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for a network testbench / simulator to stimulate known
networking conditions to test out a component for a product at work.
I was wondering if there was a network simulator available (preferably
open so
One of my 7.0 systems has a flaky gateway, and when it goes down the
node often goes down with this panic:
panic: mtx_lock() of destroyed mutex @ ../../../net/route.c:1306
cpuid = 0
KDB: enter: panic
[thread pid 28619 tid 100074 ]
Stopped at kdb_enter+0x68: ta %xcc, 1
db> wh
Trac
This is a patch to correct DMA rwad/write control register settings.
Actually it is all started from kern/96806:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=96806
BCM5714C works now but we have some remaining patch in the PR. Please
test the patch and let me know if it breaks anything.
Thanks
I think I have found a way to get rid of infamous
'hw.bge.fake_autoneg' tunable for BCM5704S. The patch works for me
but I'd like to see more test results in various environments. If
you have one of those BCM5704S (fiber) and set
'hw.bge.fake_autoneg="1"' in your /boot/loader.conf, please tes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for a network testbench / simulator to stimulate known
networking conditions to test out a component for a product at work.
I was wondering if there was a network simulator available
(preferably open source) that's FreeBSD / Linux compatible wh
Hi,
I'm looking for a network testbench / simulator to stimulate known
networking conditions to test out a component for a product at work.
I was wondering if there was a network simulator available (preferably
open source) that's FreeBSD / Linux compatible which I can simulate as real
Hi folks,
There two network interface drivers that have uncertain VLAN_MTU
support status, namely nve(4) and tl(4). The nve(4) driver has a
sign of unfinished VLAN_MTU support in it as it forgets to set the
respective bit in if_capenable; and tl(4) was told to support long
frames, but its driver
15 matches
Mail list logo