All,
I have encountered a bug while doing some testing using the ike
daemon that is bundled with the client software that I posted recently
on this list. The daemon is multi threaded and tends to stress the pfkey
interface a bit more than racoon by submitting batches of pfkey messages
in
On Apr 8, 2007, at 9:25 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Sat, 7 Apr 2007 12:16:00 +0200,
Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Hi, Bruce,
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 05:27:30AM +0100, Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
I'm all for this in principle. I believe that the case for
FAST_IPSEC
over KAME IPSEC is fairly clear fo
At Sat, 7 Apr 2007 12:16:00 +0200,
Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
>
> Hi, Bruce,
>
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 05:27:30AM +0100, Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
> > I'm all for this in principle. I believe that the case for FAST_IPSEC
> > over KAME IPSEC is fairly clear for those of us who have read the USENIX
>
On Sat, 7 Apr 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 04:49:01PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The patch removes Kame derived IPsec from the tree, and adds v6 support to
FAST_IPSEC. The IPSEC kernel option is removed, but the FAST_IPSEC option
remains. This i
Bruce Evans wrote:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
We have reported serious bug with em driver
(http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/87418) one year and
half ago.
It's very funny but most freebsd ethernet drivers cloned this bug I
seem.
You can see same bug in bce, bge
