On Apr 8, 2007, at 9:25 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Sat, 7 Apr 2007 12:16:00 +0200,
Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Hi, Bruce,
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 05:27:30AM +0100, Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
I'm all for this in principle. I believe that the case for
FAST_IPSEC
over KAME IPSEC is fairly clear for those of us who have read the
USENIX
paper. Qualitatively speaking I can say FAST_IPSEC has been more
pleasant to work with when introducing the TCP-MD5 support.
Would you point out the paper you're talking about please ?
http://www.usenix.org/events/bsdcon03/tech/leffler_ipsec.html
You need a password (i.e. you need to be a USENIX member) to read it.
FYI, you only need an USENIX account to view papers that have been
published in the last twelve months. Since this paper is from 2003,
it is viewable by anyone.
--
DaveD
