Re: IPSEC & PF - Please help

2006-10-02 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 10/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 03 October 2006 01:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Here is the article I read about patch for PF: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-pf@freebsd.org/msg01315.html > > Where can I

Re: IPSEC & PF - Please help

2006-10-02 Thread fwun
Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 03 October 2006 01:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Here is the article I read about patch for PF: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-pf@freebsd.org/msg01315.html > > Where can I find an official release of this patch for freebsd 6.1? >

Re: IPSEC & PF - Please help

2006-10-02 Thread Max Laier
On Tuesday 03 October 2006 01:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Here is the article I read about patch for PF: > http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-pf@freebsd.org/msg01315.html > Where can I find an official release of this patch for freebsd 6.1? > the FreeBSD 6.1-stable I m using is dated in early A

Re: IPSEC & PF - Please help

2006-10-02 Thread fwun
Here is the article I read about patch for PF: http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-pf@freebsd.org/msg01315.html Where can I find an official release of this patch for freebsd 6.1? the FreeBSD 6.1-stable I m using is dated in early August. Thanks S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > I am ha

IPSEC & PF - Please help

2006-10-02 Thread fwun
Hi, I am having trouble in setting up IPSEC with a remote office. I desperately need help to sort out the problem. Here is the description of this little network: My Office (with Cable Internet, sis0 is the public interface): sis0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=8 inet6 fe80::20d:b9

Re: kern/95277: [netinet] IP Encapsulation mask_match() returns wrong results

2006-10-02 Thread John-Mark Gurney
Synopsis: [netinet] IP Encapsulation mask_match() returns wrong results Responsible-Changed-From-To: net->freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: jmg Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Oct 2 23:14:49 UTC 2006 Responsible-Changed-Why: move w/ the others... http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=95277

Re: kern/95665: [if_tun] "ping: sendto: No buffer space available" with TUN interface (easily reproducable with test program)

2006-10-02 Thread John-Mark Gurney
Synopsis: [if_tun] "ping: sendto: No buffer space available" with TUN interface (easily reproducable with test program) Responsible-Changed-From-To: net->freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: jmg Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Oct 2 23:14:29 UTC 2006 Responsible-Changed-Why: move w/ the others...

Re: DNS query performance

2006-10-02 Thread Marcelo Gardini do Amaral
Does anybody have some news about this thread? Nowadays I prefer to use 4.11 until I can solve all the issues but its end-of-life is near and I'm worried. Thanks, Marcelo On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 10:30:38AM -0300, Marcelo Gardini do Amaral wrote: > > Hello Mike, > > > Although it sounds silly,

Re: ipv6 host routes

2006-10-02 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
> On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 13:56:06 +0200, > John Hay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> The key point here is whether the route is statically created or not. >> And, if I understand your intent correctly, the host route you want to >> install is not really "static" in that it can (or should) be remo

Re: D-Link DGE-530T

2006-10-02 Thread Eygene Ryabinkin
> Come's with fbsd 5.3 drivers, but not 6.1. > Is there an easy way out? Use sk(4) driver. It supports DGE-530T: - skc0: port 0xd800-0xd8ff mem 0xdfffc000-0xdfff irq 10 at device 7.0 on pci0 skc0: DGE-530T Gigabit Ethernet Adapter rev. (0x1) sk0: on skc0 sk0: Ethernet address: 00:0d:88:6

Re: ipv6 host routes

2006-10-02 Thread John Hay
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 05:19:12PM +0900, JINMEI Tatuya / [EMAIL PROTECTED]@C#:H wrote: > I should have looked at it much earlier (sorry about the delay), but I > don't this change is correct. This will easily bother statically > installed route (especially) on a point-to-point interface. No pro

Current problem reports assigned to you

2006-10-02 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems Serious problems S Tracker Resp. Description s kern/95665 net[if_tun] "ping: sendto: No buffer space available" wit 1 problem total. Non-critical

Current problem reports assigned to you

2006-10-02 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems Serious problems S Tracker Resp. Description a kern/38554 netchanging interface ipaddress doesn't seem to work s kern/39937 netipstealth

HEADS UP, minor change to IPv6 link local address setup

2006-10-02 Thread gnn
Hi Folks, I just committed to HEAD a minor change to our IPv6 support. Unless a user sets ipv6_enable to YES in rc.conf link local addresses will NOT appear on any interface. This seems to make some sense because you shouldn't have them if you didn't ask for IPv6 to be enabled. IPv6 remains in

Re: ipv6 host routes

2006-10-02 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
> On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 18:15:14 +0200, > John Hay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > With this and my FreeBSD/IPv6 port of olsrd I can run multiple wireless > interfaces with the same IPv6 subnet and olsrd can make it all work. I should have looked at it much earlier (sorry about the delay), but