Can someone take a look at PR 89061 (ipv6 autoconfigure 6to4)

2006-09-08 Thread Matt Reimer
Can someone take a look at PR 89061 (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=89061). It contains a patch adding an /etc/rc.conf knob to autoconfigure an RFC 3068 6to4 address. Matt ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mai

Re: Moving ethernet VLAN tags into the mbuf packet header (from mtags)

2006-09-08 Thread Peter Jeremy
On Thu, 2006-Sep-07 17:07:25 +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: >With the recent addition of a 16bit field for TSO into the mbuf packet >header we've got 16bits left over. I've reserved these bits for the >ethernet VLAN tagging of packet to do away with the allocated mbuf mtag. Sounds reasonable. My

Re: ng_ether and interface naming (bug or feature?)

2006-09-08 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 11:26:41AM +0400, Denis Peplin wrote: D> I have found, that changing interface names from rc.conf D> can break ng_ether when it loaded from loader.conf or D> compiled into kernel. D> D> For example, when mpd is used as PPPoE server, rc.conf D> contain ifconfig_fxp0_name="ne

Re: ipv6 host routes

2006-09-08 Thread John Hay
Ok, I have made some progress. Again I have two machines, called rtrg, which I'm working on and rtr2, the one I want to "route" to. So my /etc/hosts have this in: 2001:4200:7000:15:202:6fff:fe22:9547rtrg 2001:4200:7000:15:202:6fff:fe41:1927rtr2 If I add a route (on rtrg) like this, I do

Re: patch to not route on down interfaces

2006-09-08 Thread Doug Ambrisko
Oleg Bulyzhin writes: | On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 11:30:55AM -0700, Doug Ambrisko wrote: | > Hi guys, | > | > We "hack" a feature to have 2 NIC's configured with the same IP and | > netmask. We down one and up the other to bounce between then. We | > also set the MAC's to be the same. This fixes

Re: RFC: TSO patch for current

2006-09-08 Thread Andre Oppermann
Ian FREISLICH wrote: Andre Oppermann wrote: Jack Vogel wrote: On 9/5/06, Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If you do the ifconfig changes there will need to be a small amount of code added to em_ioctl() but it should be trivial. You want me to reissue a driver patch with changes f

Re: RFC: TSO patch for current

2006-09-08 Thread Andre Oppermann
Ian FREISLICH wrote: Andre Oppermann wrote: Jack Vogel wrote: On 9/5/06, Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If you do the ifconfig changes there will need to be a small amount of code added to em_ioctl() but it should be trivial. You want me to reissue a driver patch with changes f

Re: Gigabit ethernet questions?

2006-09-08 Thread Dinesh Nair
On 08/09/06 20:12 Dima Roshin said the following: Thanks Jon, I did it on both sides, thats much better now: gate1# sysctl kern.polling.idle_poll=1 this however does max out your CPU, even if there're no packets on the queue. -- Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to hea

Re: RFC: TSO patch for current

2006-09-08 Thread Ian FREISLICH
Andre Oppermann wrote: > Jack Vogel wrote: > > On 9/5/06, Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > If you do the ifconfig changes there will need to be a small amount of > >> > code added to em_ioctl() but it should be trivial. > >> > > >> > You want me to reissue a driver patch with chang

Re: patch to not route on down interfaces

2006-09-08 Thread Oleg Bulyzhin
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 11:30:55AM -0700, Doug Ambrisko wrote: > Hi guys, > > We "hack" a feature to have 2 NIC's configured with the same IP and > netmask. We down one and up the other to bounce between then. We > also set the MAC's to be the same. This fixes a few routing problems > in which

Re: Moving ethernet VLAN tags into the mbuf packet header (from mtags)

2006-09-08 Thread Andre Oppermann
Andrew Thompson wrote: On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 05:07:25PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: With the recent addition of a 16bit field for TSO into the mbuf packet header we've got 16bits left over. I've reserved these bits for the ethernet VLAN tagging of packet to do away with the allocated mbuf m

ng_ether and interface naming (bug or feature?)

2006-09-08 Thread Denis Peplin
Hello! I have found, that changing interface names from rc.conf can break ng_ether when it loaded from loader.conf or compiled into kernel. For example, when mpd is used as PPPoE server, rc.conf contain ifconfig_fxp0_name="net1" and /boot/loader.conf contain ng_ether_load="YES", the mpd logs: ex