Ian FREISLICH wrote:
Andre Oppermann wrote:
Jack Vogel wrote:
On 9/5/06, Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you do the ifconfig changes there will need to be a small amount of
code added to em_ioctl() but it should be trivial.
You want me to reissue a driver patch with changes for your code?
Yes, please do so. I've got a dual-em card which I can test with myself.
OK, attached new patch, this one even has the ioctl change so when
you get the ifconfig change in it will be ready.
The TSO code is committed. There has been a slight change with the
ifcapabilities to differentiate between TSO for IPv4 and IPv6 which
can be set independently.
The pseudo-header checksum is always provided in m_pkthdr.csum_data,
you don't have to compute it yourself in the driver.
TSO for IPv6 is not yet functional as it is missing the in6_pseudo()
functionand some changes to ip6_output(). I have contacted one of our
IPv6 gurus to develop the patches and get it fully functional as well.
Since this change, I get the following output from ifconfig:
em0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
options=cb<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,POLLING8TSO49TSO6,VLAN_HWCSUM>
ether 00:04:23:d4:74:46
media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseTX <full-duplex>)
status: active
If I disable polling:
em0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
options=8b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM>
ether 00:04:23:d4:74:46
media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseTX <full-duplex>)
I'm not sure if this hardware supports TSO or even if the em driver
part has been committed yet.
This is fixed now. I got the octal bit position wrong in the interface
capabilities description string. Sorry for the confusion.
--
Andre
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
