Re: routing problem?

2006-09-05 Thread Mihail Balikov
Yes, forwarding is enabled, this machine works like router - Original Message - From: "Gilberto Villani Brito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 11:00 PM Subject: Re: routing problem? > Do you have gateway_enable=YES in your /etc/rc.conf > Look the net.inet.

Re: tcp/udp performance

2006-09-05 Thread Danny Braniss
> Jack Vogel wrote: > > On 8/30/06, Danny Braniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> ever since 6.1 I've seen fluctuations in the performance of > >> the em (Intel(R) PRO/1000 Gigabit Ethernet). > >> > >> motherboard OBN (On Board NIC) > >>

Re: RFC: TSO patch for current

2006-09-05 Thread Jack Vogel
On 9/5/06, Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jack Vogel wrote: > On 9/5/06, Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Prafulla Deuskar wrote: >> > Your patch looks good and is the way to go. >> > >> > So after Jack confirms that your patch works with the em driver >> > would you comm

Re: RFC: TSO patch for current

2006-09-05 Thread Andre Oppermann
Jack Vogel wrote: On 9/5/06, Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Prafulla Deuskar wrote: > Your patch looks good and is the way to go. > > So after Jack confirms that your patch works with the em driver > would you commit to to -current? Absolutely. :-) > The driver related changes can

Re: RFC: TSO patch for current

2006-09-05 Thread Jack Vogel
On 9/5/06, Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Prafulla Deuskar wrote: > Andre Oppermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Prafulla Deuskar wrote: >>> Jack Vogel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> On 9/2/06, Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can't comment on the em part

Re: routing problem?

2006-09-05 Thread Gilberto Villani Brito
Do you have gateway_enable=YES in your /etc/rc.conf Look the net.inet.ip.forwarding: # sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding Gilberto 2006/9/1, Mihail Balikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hello, Running "route -n monitor" I see a lot of strange RTM_MISS messages : got message of size 96 on Fri Sep 1 1

Re: RFC: TSO patch for current

2006-09-05 Thread Andre Oppermann
Prafulla Deuskar wrote: Andre Oppermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Prafulla Deuskar wrote: Jack Vogel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/2/06, Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I can't comment on the em part but the tcp_output.c stuff looks very much like a straight port from NetBSD. If

Re: RFC: TSO patch for current

2006-09-05 Thread Prafulla Deuskar
Andre Oppermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Prafulla Deuskar wrote: > >Jack Vogel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >>On 9/2/06, Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > >>>I can't comment on the em part but the tcp_output.c stuff looks > >>>very much like a straight port from NetBSD. If

Re: RFC: TSO patch for current

2006-09-05 Thread Andre Oppermann
Prafulla Deuskar wrote: Jack Vogel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/2/06, Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I can't comment on the em part but the tcp_output.c stuff looks very much like a straight port from NetBSD. If we take code from the other BSDs we have to remark this in the ema

Re: RFC: TSO patch for current

2006-09-05 Thread Jack Vogel
On 9/5/06, Prafulla Deuskar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jack Vogel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 9/2/06, Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >I can't comment on the em part but the tcp_output.c stuff looks > >very much like a straight port from NetBSD. If we take code from > >the other

Re: RFC: TSO patch for current

2006-09-05 Thread Prafulla Deuskar
Jack Vogel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 9/2/06, Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >I can't comment on the em part but the tcp_output.c stuff looks > >very much like a straight port from NetBSD. If we take code from > >the other BSDs we have to remark this in the emails we send with

Re: tcp/udp performance

2006-09-05 Thread Thomas Herrlin
Jack Vogel wrote: > On 8/30/06, Danny Braniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> ever since 6.1 I've seen fluctuations in the performance of >> the em (Intel(R) PRO/1000 Gigabit Ethernet). >> >> motherboard OBN (On Board NIC) >>

Re: Request status on sk(4) for 88E8053 Yukon PCI-E GbE

2006-09-05 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Andrew Sinclair wrote: $ pciconf -lv ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:0: class=0x02 card=0x00011179 chip=0x436211ab rev=0x15 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Marvell Semiconductor (Was: Galileo Technology Ltd)' device = '88E8053 Yukon PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller (copper)' clas

Request status on sk(4) for 88E8053 Yukon PCI-E GbE

2006-09-05 Thread Andrew Sinclair
Attempting to diagnose an undetected NIC: $ uname -a FreeBSD FreeSBIE.LiveCD 6.1-RC2 FreeBSD 6.1-RC2 #3: $ pciconf -lv ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:0: class=0x02 card=0x00011179 chip=0x436211ab rev=0x15 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Marvell Semiconductor (Was: Galileo Technology Ltd)' device = '

Re: half-duplex

2006-09-05 Thread Spadge Fromley
> em1: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > options=b > inet 60.1.2.3 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 220.233.99.39 > ether 00:04:23:bc:3a:d1 > media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP ) > status: active It's quite possibly picking that up from the thing it's plugged into, ie

Re: Where is IPSec NAT-T support?

2006-09-05 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, Scott Ullrich wrote: On 9/4/06, Bjoern A. Zeeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: the patch only support kame ipsec. I guess that's the problem. Could you try it building with kame ipsec instead of fast_ipsec and let us know if that worked? That may work okay but then would I loos