Re: /31 on 2 interfaces

2006-05-17 Thread fooler
- Original Message - From: "Unix-Solutions - Steven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "fooler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Kim Shrier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 7:33 PM Subject: Re: /31 on 2 interfaces I'm need a point-to-point link between 2 servers with just a crossover

Re: disable kernel driver at boot?

2006-05-17 Thread sfp
> As I said, that's simple: Remove the driver from your > kernel configuration, then recompile the kernel. Easy. True. That should have read, suppress from the loader. And apologies for top posting on the /31 thread. ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org

Re: /31 on 2 interfaces

2006-05-17 Thread sfp
No love with a /31 mask & default bcast addr. Perhaps ARP reqs are failing to the subnet bcast address, didn't check. To fix, specify an all ones broadcast. Tested this against 6.0-Release & a Juniper box that was handy. As always, YMMV. Oliver has a point though, why not just use a /30 & sav

Re[2]: Cluster solution

2006-05-17 Thread dima
> You'd need to be more specific particularly with how much money you want to > spend. HA Clusters are expensive to build. The question was about FreeBSD. Do you know any HA solutions working with it? My company would be glad to spend quite a lot if there were one. Don't top-post, please. >

Re: disable kernel driver at boot?

2006-05-17 Thread John-Mark Gurney
sfp wrote this message on Tue, May 16, 2006 at 22:22 -0600: > From: "Oliver Fromme" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > sfp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Is it possible to disable a driver compiled into a 4.10 kernel at > > > boot time by feeding a (set?) command to the loader? > > > > > > In this ca

RE: Cluster solution

2006-05-17 Thread fbsd
Take a look at port net/freevrrpd. http://redundancy.redundancy.org/fbsd_lb.html http://www.freebsd.org.hk/html/sgcluster/ http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/carp.html http://blizzard.rwic.und.edu/~nordlie/miniwulf/ It uses MPICH and LAM/MPI Have a look at HUT (High Uptime Project) : http://

Re: nd6_lookup prints bogus messages with point to point devices

2006-05-17 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
> On Mon, 8 May 2006 08:58:41 +0200, > Ed Schouten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I'm seeing the messages on the machine in Eindhoven (running RELENG_6 > from a few days/weeks ago), but they also show up on my HEAD machine at > home. Below is the output of `ifconfig gif0` on my machine at ho

Re: Cluster solution

2006-05-17 Thread Derek Ragona
You'd need to be more specific particularly with how much money you want to spend. HA Clusters are expensive to build. -Derek At 10:18 AM 5/17/2006, Ludovit Koren wrote: Hi, I need help in designing of cluster solution based on FreeBSD. I tried carp for switching IP addresses, it s

Re: [PATCH] Re: IP_MAX_MEMBERSHIPS story.

2006-05-17 Thread Stephen Clark
Bruce M Simpson wrote: On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 03:00:44PM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote: So I will be updating the patch in the next 24 hours. Given that it seems stable for values 2047 <= n <= 4095 with SOCK_DGRAM I am inclined to commit with the maximum raised to 4095 and lazy allocation in

Cluster solution

2006-05-17 Thread Ludovit Koren
Hi, I need help in designing of cluster solution based on FreeBSD. I tried carp for switching IP addresses, it seems to work ok. The solution is suitable for DNS, MTA, static web pages, web proxy and reverse proxy. I didn't find anything quite suitable for dynamic web pages with PHP and MySQL b

More 'resource' problems with "ath0"

2006-05-17 Thread Ross Finlayson
The problems are occurring even with a very recently built kernel: %cat /etc/motd FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE (GENERIC) #0: Tue May 16 15:55:19 PDT 2006 May 17 07:53:22 ns dhcpd: send_packet: No buffer space available May 17 07:53:25 ns dhcpd: send_packet: No buffer space available May 17 07:53:35 ns nam

Re: disable kernel driver at boot?

2006-05-17 Thread Oliver Fromme
sfp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd still like to find a way to suppress the driver in the kernel entirely > though :P As I said, that's simple: Remove the driver from your kernel configuration, then recompile the kernel. Easy. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co.

Re: /31 on 2 interfaces

2006-05-17 Thread Oliver Fromme
Unix-Solutions - Steven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm need a point-to-point link between 2 servers > with just a crossover cable between the servers. That's not a point-to-point link. It's a broadcast network that happens to have only two nodes. Just make your addresses /30 instead of /31.

Re: /31 on 2 interfaces

2006-05-17 Thread Unix-Solutions - Steven
I'm need a point-to-point link between 2 servers with just a crossover cable between the servers. - Original Message - From: "fooler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Kim Shrier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Unix-Solutions - Steven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 5:49 AM Subje

Re: IPv6 raw socket to send original udp

2006-05-17 Thread Robert Watson
On Tue, 16 May 2006, JINMEI Tatuya / [ISO-2022-JP] ¿ÀÌÀãºÈ wrote: So, if a program needs to specify an arbitrary source IPv6 address for outgoing packets, it should use other "packet injection" interface such as BPF. One problem with using BPF for packet injection in IPv4 is that it requires