- Original Message -
From: "Julian Elischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "M. Parsons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 12:49 AM
Subject: Re: PPPoE question.
M. Parsons wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering if the freebsd kernel supports synchronous pppoe?
I currently us
On Tuesday 28 March 2006 11:31, Max Laier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while porting OpenBSD 3.9 (soon to be released) pf I stumbled on interface
> groups. This is a mechanism to group arbitrary interfaces into logical
> groups. It is just naming (not functional change), but it helps to convey
> semantic inf
Your mail to 'Ocfs-announce' with the subject
Returned mail: see transcript for details
Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
The reason it is being held:
Post by non-member to a members-only list
Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Kelly Yancey wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 2 Apr 2006, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
On Sun, 2 Apr 2006, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Why not? IMHO it will be very useful feature: think about e.g. traffic
shaping for several different networks which are routed via the same
ipsec tunnel. Wit
I can report even more regression with the most recent version (0409) :(
My 2915 seems to work with RELENG_6_0 only. Not always though. Sometimes I had
to reboot to make it associated. Plus the outgoing traffic problem.
I could only associate several times with older versions of RELENG_6. Well,
On Sun, 2 Apr 2006, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> On Sun, 2 Apr 2006, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> >> Why not? IMHO it will be very useful feature: think about e.g. traffic
> >> shaping for several different networks which are routed via the same
> >> ipsec tunnel. Without the enc0, you ca
> Lastly, if anybody already worked on this: do you have any additional
> suggestion? In particular regarding the testing methodology: since a
> few years have passed, I'm not quite sure whether different OSs have
> implemented any countermeasure. I'm mainly testing against a FreeBSD
> box I contr
M. Parsons wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering if the freebsd kernel supports synchronous pppoe?
I currently use LInux and I use synchronous pppoe (the n_hldc line
discipline module), and I find that if I have synchronous off, network
efficiency is not what its supposed to be.
what the heck is s
On Tuesday 11 April 2006 16:15, Zane C.B. wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 11:38:24 +0200 (CEST)
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have a problem setting up Intel PRO / Wireless 2200BG on Asus
> > A3500N machine running FreeBSD 6.0. I tried to follow instructions
> > at http://damien.bergamini.free.
Hello,
I was wondering if the freebsd kernel supports synchronous pppoe?
I currently use LInux and I use synchronous pppoe (the n_hldc line
discipline module), and I find that if I have synchronous off, network
efficiency is not what its supposed to be.
Didnt find it anywhere mentioned in the ha
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 11:38:24 +0200 (CEST)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a problem setting up Intel PRO / Wireless 2200BG on Asus
> A3500N machine running FreeBSD 6.0. I tried to follow instructions
> at http://damien.bergamini.free.fr/ipw/ipw-freebsd.html but they are
> ok up till some point
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 17:59:50 +0400
dima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 11:26:40PM +0400, dima wrote:
> > > 3. Is at least implementation of NFS client (either kernel-side or
> > > user-space) stable enough for production use? Client OS
> > > replacement is impossible (hardl
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 11:26:40PM +0400, dima wrote:
> > 3. Is at least implementation of NFS client (either kernel-side or
> > user-space) stable enough for production use? Client OS replacement is
> > impossible (hardly suitable, really) in my project.
>
> I built a big mail/web cluster a few
Sorry, but nope. But I guess if you can post a complete source code
Again your right ;-)
There are two functions udp_raw_send and ip4_udp_raw_send. The first
function which is called udp_raw_send has 6 arguments: source
address, destination address, source port, destination port, payload
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 11:26:40PM +0400, dima wrote:
> 3. Is at least implementation of NFS client (either kernel-side or
> user-space) stable enough for production use? Client OS replacement is
> impossible (hardly suitable, really) in my project.
I built a big mail/web cluster a few years ago u
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a problem setting up Intel PRO / Wireless 2200BG on Asus
> A3500N machine running FreeBSD 6.0. I tried to follow instructions
> at http://damien.bergamini.free.fr/ipw/ipw-freebsd.html but they are
> ok up till some point. I've installed iwi-firmware as needed an
> On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 10:52:31 +0200,
> Stefan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Any suggestions for the second major problem?
Sorry, but nope. But I guess if you can post a complete source code
(not a snippet of it) and arguments to the program that can reproduce
the problem, and identify th
I have a problem setting up Intel PRO / Wireless 2200BG on Asus
A3500N machine running FreeBSD 6.0. I tried to follow instructions
at http://damien.bergamini.free.fr/ipw/ipw-freebsd.html but they are
ok up till some point. I've installed iwi-firmware as needed and
dmesg shows right wireless adapted
I guess in this case getaddrinfo() tried to match the specified
"service" (port) with a raw socket (for which there is no notion of
"service"), and returned an error.
Yes your right, I tried it without the port argument and it went fine.
BTW, when I tried the same test on Solaris 10 and Op
> On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 11:40:46 +0200,
> Stefan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I'm trying to port my little application to the FreeBSD-system and
> encountered some difficults I can't solve. The program is running
> fine on SunOS, OpenBSD, Mac OS X and Debian GNU/Linux so I thought it
>
20 matches
Mail list logo
