On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 11:51:44PM +0100, Bart Van Kerckhove wrote:
> > Heh. At first I read this and wasn't sure what ECMP was, I've never
> > seen anyone use that acronym before.
>
> Hmm, sorry if I used a non-common term there, it's the only abbreviation i
> know of ;>
I have always just used
Brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 09:52:07PM +, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 10:36:20PM +0100, Bart Van Kerckhove wrote:
>>> ECMP was indeed one of the features i was looking for at that time,
>>> which i found to be impossible.
>>> I just don't like
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Ross Finlayson wrote:
What is the reason for the sudden flood of spam on several FreeBSD mailing
lists? Do these lists no longer require that senders be subscribed to the
list? Or are legitimate senders' computers infected with a virus that is
sending the spam in their n
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 09:52:07PM +, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 10:36:20PM +0100, Bart Van Kerckhove wrote:
> > ECMP was indeed one of the features i was looking for at that time, which i
> > found to be impossible.
> > I just don't like the idea of moving towards anothe
Bruce M Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 10:36:20PM +0100, Bart Van Kerckhove wrote:
>> ECMP was indeed one of the features i was looking for at that time,
>> which i found to be impossible.
>> I just don't like the idea of moving towards another platform just
>> for thi
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 10:36:20PM +0100, Bart Van Kerckhove wrote:
> ECMP was indeed one of the features i was looking for at that time, which i
> found to be impossible.
> I just don't like the idea of moving towards another platform just for this
> reason, since I'm very happy with freebsd's p
Bruce M Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 07:35:20PM +0100, Bart Van Kerckhove wrote:
>> Is this by design, or just lack of time/interest?
>> If anyone feels up to the task of fixing/implementing what's needed
>> to make this work, we'd be happy to sponsor its developmen
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 07:52:13PM +0100, OxY wrote:
> media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseTX )
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Pertti Kosunen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Sten Daniel S?rsdal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "OxY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 7:18 PM
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 07:35:20PM +0100, Bart Van Kerckhove wrote:
> Is this by design, or just lack of time/interest?
> If anyone feels up to the task of fixing/implementing what's needed to make
> this work, we'd be happy to sponsor its development.
This is a collision between the connected ro
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 08:42:09AM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote:
> On 3/16/06, Yuriy N. Shkandybin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > I have 2 freebsd servers connected by dedicated wire via em interfaces.
> > systems = 6.1-PRERELEASE #0: Tue Mar 14 11:58:23 MSK 2006
> >
> > 1st)
> > man em sa
media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseTX )
- Original Message -
From: "Pertti Kosunen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Sten Daniel Sørsdal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "OxY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 7:18 PM
Subject: Re: problem with Marwell gigabit performance
Sten Dan
On 3/16/06, Yuriy N. Shkandybin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have 2 freebsd servers connected by dedicated wire via em interfaces.
> systems = 6.1-PRERELEASE #0: Tue Mar 14 11:58:23 MSK 2006
>
> 1st)
> man em says
> MTU size for Jumbo Frames is 16114 and i'm sure i've setup this on free
>> mfd(config)# int vlan59
>> mfd(config-if)# ip address 10.197.66.97/27
>> % Can't set interface IP address: File exists.
>> mfd(config-if)#
>
> It's FreeBSD's behavior
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] route add 10.0.0.0/30 192.168.1.1
> add net 10.0.0.0: gateway 192.168.1.1
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ifconfig vl
Bart Van Kerckhove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> mfd(config)# int vlan59
>>> mfd(config-if)# ip address 10.197.66.97/27
>>> % Can't set interface IP address: File exists.
>>> mfd(config-if)#
>>
>> It's FreeBSD's behavior
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] route add 10.0.0.0/30 192.168.1.1
>> add net 10
Sten Daniel Sørsdal wrote:
You might have a duplex mismatch problem.
Isn't there only full-duplex in 1000baseTX?
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PR
OxY wrote:
tested with iperf (bidirectional test, udp transfer, not stream)
and got 8-15% packet drop when the system was idle.
You might have a duplex mismatch problem.
--
Sten Daniel Sørsdal
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Ross Finlayson wrote:
What is the reason for the sudden flood of spam on several FreeBSD
mailing lists? Do these lists no longer require that senders be
subscribed to the list? Or are legitimate senders' computers infected
with a virus that is sending the spam in their names?
Ross.
S
U]tra Allure Pheromones work like the power of Cupid.
[1]http://www.deceos.info/ph/?q6c40b
References
1. http://www.deceos.info/ph/?q6c40b
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubs
[ ...cross-posting minimized to one list, postmaster@ CC'ed... ]
Ross Finlayson wrote:
> What is the reason for the sudden flood of spam on several FreeBSD
> mailing lists? Do these lists no longer require that senders be
> subscribed to the list? Or are legitimate senders' computers infected
>
Just to emphasize the fact, I'd actually remove the ifconfig_ lines from my
rc.conf, so when the OS came up, it did not assign an IP to the interface.
IPMI refused to work until I assigned an IP. Once assigned, I can remove
the IP and do ifconfig em0 down, etc. and the IPMI continues to work (unti
Hello,
The help is much appreciate. Just to test thoroughly, I recompiled my
kernel without the em driver, and I didn't load the module in loader.conf.
Upon rebooting, it flew through just fine, and I was even able to drop to
single-user mode with no issues. I then enabled the em module in the
l
Hello
I have 2 freebsd servers connected by dedicated wire via em interfaces.
systems = 6.1-PRERELEASE #0: Tue Mar 14 11:58:23 MSK 2006
1st)
man em says
MTU size for Jumbo Frames is 16114 and i'm sure i've setup this on freebsd-5
and probably ealier 6.0
But now
ifconfig em1 mtu 16114
ifconfig
What is the reason for the sudden flood of spam on several FreeBSD
mailing lists? Do these lists no longer require that senders be
subscribed to the list? Or are legitimate senders' computers
infected with a virus that is sending the spam in their names?
Ross.
__
0316172843webseedsig
ºô¸ôÁͶդw¨ÓÁ{
¤£n¦AÅý±zªº¹q¸£¨IºÎ¡I
¤W¯ZÁ~¤ô¦³¡A¦ýºô¸ô°Ó¾÷¬OµL!
YµLªkÁpµ²½Ð½Æ»s¦¹ºô§} http://53.dance.to/
³sµ²«á·|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|¨à...
--
»O¥_¥«¬F©²ºô¯¸º¶ http://www.taipei.gov.tw
¥x¥_¥«¬F©²¥«¥Á¹q¤l«H½cªA°Èºô http://webmail.sn.tpemail.net.tw
___
24 matches
Mail list logo
