Bruce M Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 10:36:20PM +0100, Bart Van Kerckhove wrote: >> ECMP was indeed one of the features i was looking for at that time, >> which i found to be impossible. >> I just don't like the idea of moving towards another platform just >> for this reason, since I'm very happy with freebsd's performance. >> There used to be a patch for ECMP, but it was a huge hack. very >> dirty at best. > > itojun recently committed a set of ECMP related changes to OpenBSD. > Unfortunately I have not had free time to review them in any detail. > What approach did they take? The ecmp patch i encountered for freebsd didn't lift the limitation regarding 1 route/pfx/pfxlen in the fib. Is this the case here too? Or did they take a new approach? > I hope andre@ is watching this thread, it's probably on his laundry > list too. I believe other parties may have implemented the hack you > are referring to. He is watching :) (lucky me/us ;])
Met vriendelijke groet / With kind regards, Bart Van Kerckhove [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
