ALTQ slowness

2006-02-21 Thread Andrew Thompson
Hi, I am having a problem where it appears that the queue speed is 1/10th of the desired number. I have this simple setup on a bridge and can not get any more than about 1700 Bps with a http download (roughly 12Kbits). altq on sis0 cbq bandwidth 256Kb queue { std_in } queue std_inbandwidth

Re: [FIX] dummynet breaks IP reassembly

2006-02-21 Thread Joerg Pernfuss
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 13:11:02 +0200 Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry, I won't be committing this myself to RELENG_5 mostly due > to lack of time to manage four branches (I still care about > RELENG_4 for job reasons). I guess you'll have to find another > interested committer. Th

Re: Which motherboards work well with em(4)?

2006-02-21 Thread Jack Vogel
On 2/20/06, Chris Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > hmm, well these arent anything bleeding edge, so isnt any hardware > > issues that occur to me > > OK. I have reported this problem in the past and a few people like Gleb > Smirnoff and Christian Peron have helped in diagnosing and providin

Re: bind9 + host command issue in FreeBSD-5.4

2006-02-21 Thread tpeixoto
Hi Doug, first of all I want to thank you for your reply. The domain I referred before belongs to a bank in Brazil and usually it's hard to get anything from those guys so I've found a workaround and put their 'MX' IP in our mailertable and now it worked fine. Also, I've tried many things like:

Re: Which motherboards work well with em(4)?

2006-02-21 Thread Chris Howells
Hi Jack, On Tue, February 21, 2006 4:23 am, Jack Vogel wrote: >> Since they are different ethernet controllers I am wondering if it could >> be the motherboard failing to deal with the interrupts, or maybe even >> the >> ethernet switch. Polling appears not to help though. The switch is a >> chea

Re: [FIX] dummynet breaks IP reassembly

2006-02-21 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 01:49:14AM +0100, Joerg Pernfuss wrote: > Hi, > > on the german questions list someone encountered 'ip reassembly time > exceeded' errors on his router running 5.4-RELEASE. Looking at the > ip_id of the packets, it seemed like the same error. > > Here is a naive RELENG_5