Nate Nielsen wrote:
Sam Leffler wrote:
You might try explaining why you think polling helps your performance.
Unless you've significantly restructured the interrupt handling in the
driver most work is deferred to a non-interrupt context.
Yes, I saw that. However the interrupts themselves w
Sam Leffler wrote:
> You might try explaining why you think polling helps your performance.
> Unless you've significantly restructured the interrupt handling in the
> driver most work is deferred to a non-interrupt context.
Yes, I saw that. However the interrupts themselves when they are fired
a
Nate Nielsen wrote:
I've been working on polling for the FreeBSD ath wireless driver.
On slow CPU's polling helps prevent (by supressing certain interrupts)
livelock and increases throughput. This is true of Atheros cards on
Soekris and other embedded hardware.
Just thought I'd post something h
Lukas Muehlethaler wrote:
I want to buy a wireless PCI adapter for a machine running FreeBSD 6.0.
After reading the archives, man pages, etc. I realized that his is a
tricky business. Some of the adaptors listed as supported have now a
different chipset. For example, Netgear WG311T now has the
On Saturday 04 February 2006 16:16, Max Laier wrote:
> On Thursday 02 February 2006 14:37, Max Laier wrote:
> > On Thursday 02 February 2006 13:43, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> > > > This needs to be fixed in pf then.
> > >
> > > Max Laier and I discussed this issue once, and Max had concern
> > > over poss
At Sat, 4 Feb 2006 16:16:49 +0100,
Max Laier wrote:
> Here it is. I'd appreciate feedback. pflog_packet() uses a lot of complex
> types which makes it necessary to include pfvar.h. This is ugly, but I don't
> know how to work around this.
I gave this a quick read and it looked OK to me.
Late
