To where should I address a fix for /usr/src/lib/libc/rpc code?

Hi, I've been fixing code in a recently (yesterday) cvsupped i386 Release 6.0 system and would like to know where I should direct my atttention (and code) to. Thanks, Damien Miller = Sub UNIX lumen [EMAIL PROTECTED] = -- Aluminium Oxide [EMAI

Fwd: /usr/src/lib/libc/net/res_debug.c: compile problem fixed

Oops. Let's try that again, with the attachments this time... On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 12:39:26 +1030, "Aluminium Oxide" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I've fixed a problem with res_debug.c, which, during a make buildworld > on a 6.0 RELEASE i386 system cvsupped yesterday, was stopping with > these erro

/usr/src/lib/libc/net/res_debug.c: compile problem fixed

I've fixed a problem with res_debug.c, which, during a make buildworld on a 6.0 RELEASE i386 system cvsupped yesterday, was stopping with these errors : . In file included from /usr/src/lib/libc/net/res_debug.c:733: /usr/src/lib/li

route selection and ipfw forwarding

Let's say that I wanted to balance upstream traffic across four WAN links to the same ISP and default gateway using IPFW probabilities. Can the FreeBSD routing table contain multiple routes to the same destination? How would a route be selected and could such a selection be influenced by IPFW? __

Re: IPSEC documentation

Brian Candler wrote: > The IPSEC documentation at > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ipsec.html is > pretty weird. It suggests that you encapsulate your packets in IP-IP (gif) > encapsulation and THEN encapsulate that again using IPSEC tunnel mode. > This is a really str

Re: tcp performance

Zongsheng Zhang wrote: Hi, *, For testing throughput of a TCP connection, the following topology is used: Host-A ---GB Ethernet--- Dummynet ---GB Ethernet--- Host-B Host-A/B use FreeBSD v6.0. Sysctl parameters of Host-A/B are: kern.ipc.nmbclusters=32768 net.inet.tcp.inflight.enable=0 net.i

Re: Routing SMP benefit

Andre Oppermann wrote: Markus Oestreicher wrote: Currently running a few routers on 5-STABLE I have read the recent changes in the network stack with interest. You should run 6.0R. It contains many improvements over 5-STABLE. A few questions come to my mind: - Can a machine tha

Re: bge BCM5721/BCM5750 fixes to work with IPMI

Doug Ambrisko wrote: Here are some first pass patches to make the bge driver not break IPMI. This was tested on a Dell PE850: bge0: mem 0xfe6f-0xfe6f irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci4 miibus1: on bge0 brgphy0: on miibus1 brgphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 100