Re: -current link layer spaghetti diagram

Andrew Thompson wrote: On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 06:46:03PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: A first attempt can be seen at: http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/layer2-current.pdf this is not a call graph, but a diagram of where packets can be passed. comments from vlan, pfil, CARP. if_bridge devel

Re: -current link layer spaghetti diagram

On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 06:46:03PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > A first attempt can be seen at: > http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/layer2-current.pdf > > this is not a call graph, but a diagram of where packets can be passed. > > comments from vlan, pfil, CARP. if_bridge developers are welcome.

-current link layer spaghetti diagram

A first attempt can be seen at: http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/layer2-current.pdf this is not a call graph, but a diagram of where packets can be passed. comments from vlan, pfil, CARP. if_bridge developers are welcome. those new-fangled bits worry me :-) julian ___

Re: diagram of 4.10 layer 2 spaghetti

Marko Zec wrote: On Thursday 27 October 2005 00:17, Julian Elischer wrote: I never saw this go past so I'll send it once again... maybe it looked too much like spam? I dunno. No, it got through the first time as well. And I think the diagrams are quite usable indeed, thanks for pro

Re: diagram of 4.10 layer 2 spaghetti

On Thursday 27 October 2005 00:17, Julian Elischer wrote: > I never saw this go past so I'll send it once again... > > maybe it looked too much like spam? I dunno. No, it got through the first time as well. And I think the diagrams are quite usable indeed, thanks for providing this! Cheers, Ma

Re: diagram of 4.10 layer 2 spaghetti

I never saw this go past so I'll send it once again... maybe it looked too much like spam? I dunno. Julian Elischer wrote: at: http://people.freebsd.org/~julian/layer2b.pdf I'm going to do one for -current BTW there is also one for the variant of 4.10 I am using at work.. http://pe

diagram of 4.10 layer 2 spaghetti

at: http://people.freebsd.org/~julian/layer2b.pdf I'm going to do one for RELENG_4 by add in the bits added, and then, the big task.. one for -current BTW there is also one for the variant of 4.10 I am using at work.. http://people.freebsd.org/~julian/layer2c.pdf but it's probably

Cellular Modem, PPP, and FreeBSD

Greetings. I am running a stripped down version of FreeBSD 4.11 on an embedded x86 board. I have an embedded cellular modem module (from MultiTech) that is attached to the serial port (going through the necessary RS232-TTL chip). I am using PPP to connect to the Internet through verizon. Everyth

Top Posting (was Re: Trying to make a Host into a gigabit hub for testing)

On 2005-10-26T18:17:33+0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 07:15:18AM -0700, Shawn Saunders wrote: > S> Actually, I think one2many is more appropriate. I do not want the traffic > S> that is coming in on the incoming ports to be echoed back to them, and > S> isn't that what the

Re: Trying to make a Host into a gigabit hub for testing

On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 07:15:18AM -0700, Shawn Saunders wrote: S> Actually, I think one2many is more appropriate. I do not want the traffic S> that is coming in on the incoming ports to be echoed back to them, and S> isn't that what the ng_hub would do? No, it wouldn't. It will send to all por

Re: Trying to make a Host into a gigabit hub for testing

Actually, I think one2many is more appropriate. I do not want the traffic that is coming in on the incoming ports to be echoed back to them, and isn't that what the ng_hub would do? Shawn - Original Message - From: "Gleb Smirnoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Shawn Saunders" <[EMAIL PROT