Actually, I think one2many is more appropriate. I do not want the traffic
that is coming in on the incoming ports to be echoed back to them, and isn't
that what the ng_hub would do?
Shawn
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gleb Smirnoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Shawn Saunders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 10:32 PM
Subject: Re: Trying to make a Host into a gigabit hub for testing
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 09:31:15PM +0000, Shawn Saunders wrote:
S> Chris,
S>
S> Now the traffic is going out all the ports, thanks. Only one issue, is
S> that it is also being echo'd back the em0 interface. When I put this
under
S> a full GIGABIT load, 6 interfaces feeding back what was just sent them,
S> will kill my primary em0 interface.
S>
S> Is there a way to make the echo from em0 to all other interfaces only
go
S> one-way, rather than em0 also being part of the group and receiving
S> everthing it sends back again?
I haven't yet understood the graph you built, but the Subject line
tells me that you should use ng_hub(4), not ng_one2many(4) or ng_fec(4).
--
Totus tuus, Glebius.
GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
