Hello Marcin,
MJ> man ifconfig should be the place to start.
:) re read it 2 year, for information about
MJ> Anyway, you can connect two PCs when one of them runs in
MJ> hostap and the other one in ad-hoc mode.
MJ> This will set up one of them as AP:
MJ> ifconfig_ath0="inet 12.23.34.1 netmask 255
Gleb Smirnoff escreveu:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 04:00:08PM -0300, Daniel Dias Gon?alves wrote:
D> I installed MPD and it doesn't start, NETGRAPH is enable on kernel.
mpd-3.18 doesn't work on AMD64. Future mpd-3.19 will work. However,
the problem is already fixed in mpd port. You need to update
On 10/3/05, Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> R> Gleb, is it on RELENG_5 ?
>
> Yes.
That's what I meant. Either it wasn't marked as such when I checked,
or I just didn't see it (quite possible).
Thanks.
David
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org maili
Arne Wrner wrote this message on Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 14:21 -0700:
> Thank u for ur answer...
>
> --- Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1) One can only queue *OUT*going traffic
> > 2) All unclassified outgoing traffic ends up in the default
> > queue
> > 3) Don't forget about 1)
> >
Dear Max,
Thank u for ur answer...
--- Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) One can only queue *OUT*going traffic
> 2) All unclassified outgoing traffic ends up in the default
> queue
> 3) Don't forget about 1)
>
Hmm...
Isn't it possible to tell the sender of a stream to slow down?
Arne,
On Monday 03 October 2005 21:17, Arne W�rner wrote:
> Since my server cannot process gracefully a 20Mb/s stream on one
> NIC, while ntpd (or ping) runs on the other NIC (round trip times
> increase from about 60msec to 300msec), I tried to limit the
> sporadic big data stream to not more tha
Hiho!
I use pf.
Since my server cannot process gracefully a 20Mb/s stream on one
NIC, while ntpd (or ping) runs on the other NIC (round trip times
increase from about 60msec to 300msec), I tried to limit the
sporadic big data stream to not more than 9Mb/s.
When I look at "pfctl -s queue -vv" it
What should i do to avoid these messages from MRTG and dhclient? This
happens with some network load on xl0 interface and pf+altq or
ipfw+dummynet+statefull rules enabled, even with simple pass rules.
Increasing kern.ipc.nmbclusters, kern.ipc.nsfbufs, kern.ipc.somaxconn
and net.inet.tcp.sendsp
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 05:41:32PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
Hi Gleb,
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 02:07:31PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
> C> I've discovered an application for which netgraph looks perfect, so have
> C> just started reading the docs whilst paying proper attention. I started
> C> o
Ceri,
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 02:07:31PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
C> I've discovered an application for which netgraph looks perfect, so have
C> just started reading the docs whilst paying proper attention. I started
C> out with ng_tee as it looked the simplest, but I've found myself
C> confus
I've discovered an application for which netgraph looks perfect, so have
just started reading the docs whilst paying proper attention. I started
out with ng_tee as it looked the simplest, but I've found myself
confused already.
The manpage for ng_tee says:
Tee nodes have four hooks, right, lef
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 02:29:35PM +0200, Ferdinand Goldmann wrote:
F> Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
F>
F> >All I can say: I have faced this problem, too. :( This is not problem in
F> >polling, but in em.
F> >
F>
F> Thank you! Just now I downloaded the driver from the Intel website; seems
F> to compile f
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
All I can say: I have faced this problem, too. :( This is not problem in
polling, but in em.
Thank you! Just now I downloaded the driver from the Intel website; seems to
compile fine, but I'll have to wait at least until tomorrow morning to test it.
Do you have any exp
Current FreeBSD problem reports
Critical problems
Serious problems
Non-critical problems
S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description
---
o [2003/07/11] kern/54383 net [nfs] [patch] NFS root configurations w
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 12:31:59PM +0200, Ferdinand Goldmann wrote:
F> Initial observations showed that the system had a very high interrupt load,
F> most of the times > 50%, and lagged a little bit. Plus, performance-testing
F> with tcpspray yielded bad results at around 10MB/s, or even worse. S
Hello All!
We are using a 1.2GHz xSeries machine to do poor man's traffic shaping for the
student hostels connected to our campus. We are using dummynet to do shaping,
there is no stateful filtering, there are however several filter rules to lock
out people and to do MAC based filtering. Numbe
Folks,
Has anybody looked at kern/86618? It looks like a piece of cake.
Yuriy, the originator, tells that nge(4) panics his RELENG_6 and
HEAD systems, but adding M_ZERO to contigmalloc() flags at one spot
in if_nge.c is enough to get rid of the trouble (patch included.)
Yuriy and yours truly were
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 11:15:59AM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote:
R> >D> The version of ng_split.c packaged with 5.4 Release has a bug in it
R> >D> that causes items to get lost (not freed) if there are no nodes
R> >D> connected on the other end.
R> >D>
R> >D> This has been fixed in the CVS, Revision
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 02:27:11PM -0600, David Vos wrote:
D> The version of ng_split.c packaged with 5.4 Release has a bug in it
D> that causes items to get lost (not freed) if there are no nodes
D> connected on the other end.
D>
D> This has been fixed in the CVS, Revision
19 matches
Mail list logo
