I plan to commit a major rework of network interface related storage
Friday morning PDT. This is a massive change touching every network
driver in the system. This change was discussed at the BSDCan dev
summit and derives from discussions at EuroBSDCon on dealing with
dynamic network devices. Yo
At 02.10 09/06/2005, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>On Thursday, 9 June 2005 at 1:46:00 +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
>> Greg,
>>
>>> My understanding is that GRE is to IP as PPP is to SLIP: it allows
>>> multiple protocols to be encapsulated. I've done some tracing with
>>> Ethereal, and the only
On Thursday, 9 June 2005 at 1:46:00 +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> Greg,
>
>> My understanding is that GRE is to IP as PPP is to SLIP: it allows
>> multiple protocols to be encapsulated. I've done some tracing with
>> Ethereal, and the only difference is a four-byte header in front of
>> the pay
Greg,
> My understanding is that GRE is to IP as PPP is to SLIP: it allows
> multiple protocols to be encapsulated. I've done some tracing with
> Ethereal, and the only difference is a four-byte header in front of
> the payload for GRE; in an IP tunnel, it's simply missing. I've
> written this u
On Wednesday, 8 June 2005 at 12:40:53 +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
>>> It's currently pushing 7:30 pm, and I was going to send out a reply
>>> tomorrow. But indeed, it seems that Linux people prefer GRE tunnels,
>>> we prefer (with good reason) IP tunnels, and the whole issue was one
>>> of docum
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 09:55:28PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This is the 2nd time I search for a resolution on this matter I could not find
> any documents online regarding this issue.
> We are building a system with the following hardware:
>
> Tyan S2882 Dual Opteron Board (latest BIOS
On 2005-06-08 12:40, Jeremie Le Hen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> IIRC,
> - Linux uses the ipip module to do IP-over-IP tunnel
> - FreeBSD uses the gre(4) interface to do GRE tunnels
> - GRE is a Cisco product and means ``Generic Routing
> Encapsulation''. I don't know what the
> > It's currently pushing 7:30 pm, and I was going to send out a reply
> > tomorrow. But indeed, it seems that Linux people prefer GRE tunnels,
> > we prefer (with good reason) IP tunnels, and the whole issue was one
> > of documentation. After changing my tunnel from GRE to IP, it worked
> > (a
On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> On Wednesday, 8 June 2005 at 10:49:46 +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> >> I don't see any reply. But that's not surprising, since the echo
> >> packet doesn't get delivered. To summarize again:
> >>
> >> - rl0 is the external int
On Wednesday, 8 June 2005 at 10:49:46 +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
>> I don't see any reply. But that's not surprising, since the echo
>> packet doesn't get delivered. To summarize again:
>>
>> - rl0 is the external interface (-> DSL), IP 150.101.14.10.
>> - xl0 is the internal inte
Hi Greg,
> I don't see any reply. But that's not surprising, since the echo
> packet doesn't get delivered. To summarize again:
>
> - rl0 is the external interface (-> DSL), IP 150.101.14.10.
> - xl0 is the internal interface, IP 192.109.197.143.
> - encapsulated packet comes in from 203.16.215
On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, 10:38+0200, Jose M Rodriguez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I ports PR bin/67550 time ago, with minor fixes to tftpd protocol impl.
> and support for blksize option.
>
> Can someone review this before RELENG_6? Tested here with pxelinux
> clients.
I'm slowly working on merging blocksize an
Hi,
I ports PR bin/67550 time ago, with minor fixes to tftpd protocol impl.
and support for blksize option.
Can someone review this before RELENG_6? Tested here with pxelinux
clients.
--
josemi
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists
13 matches
Mail list logo
