On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> On Wednesday, 8 June 2005 at 10:49:46 +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > > >> I don't see any reply. But that's not surprising, since the echo > >> packet doesn't get delivered. To summarize again: > >> > >> - rl0 is the external interface (-> DSL), IP 150.101.14.10. > >> - xl0 is the internal interface, IP 192.109.197.143. > >> - encapsulated packet comes in from 203.16.215.227 with data from IP > >> 192.83.231.16 for 192.109.197.145. It should go out xl0. > >> - It doesn't. No further indication of why not. > > > > I saw your commit on gif(4) manual page precising that gif(4) does not > > do GRE tunnels. Does it represent a solution to your problem ? > > Heh. Yes :-) > > It's currently pushing 7:30 pm, and I was going to send out a reply > tomorrow. But indeed, it seems that Linux people prefer GRE tunnels, > we prefer (with good reason) IP tunnels, and the whole issue was one > of documentation. After changing my tunnel from GRE to IP, it worked > (and works) like a charm. > > But there's more to come, including a docco for Internode to hand to > their FreeBSD customers (sadly, once they were FreeBSD, but they moved > to Linux). Watch this space. > > Greg > -- > The virus contained in this message was not detected. > > Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP public key. > See complete headers for address and phone numbers. > What is the difference between gre and gif tunnels anyway... the man mages were not that informative... ~NVX _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
