FreeBSD5.4 Intel SRCS16 Raid5 Problem

Hello, I'm running a Tyan 2882 with Dual Opteron 244 an Intel SRCS16 PCI-X with Raid5 configuration of 5 x 200GB Western Digital SATA 7.2KRPM. I installed system via CD it detected the Raid fine and identified the correct space allocation. Once it reached the installation part the install burs

Re: Packets don't flow from ng_netflow

On Wednesday 01 June 2005 11:10 am, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: > Matthew Reimer wrote: > > The problem is that no NetFlow packets are emitted unless I run tcpdump > > on dc0. Is this not a valid configuration? Or is there a bug in > > netgraph/ng_netflow? > > nope. tcpdump(1) puts interface into promi

Re: Packets don't flow from ng_netflow

Matthew Reimer wrote: I'm trying to use ng_netflow to monitor our network traffic but for some reason NetFlow packets aren't emitted unless tcpdump is running on the interface configured with ng_netflow. The box is running FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE and the latest ng_netflow from ports. It has two N

Packets don't flow from ng_netflow

I'm trying to use ng_netflow to monitor our network traffic but for some reason NetFlow packets aren't emitted unless tcpdump is running on the interface configured with ng_netflow. The box is running FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE and the latest ng_netflow from ports. It has two NICs: the main NIC fxp0 w

Update to [EMAIL PROTECTED] v0.81

I feel so sorry to release two news at one day. The first opened version of [EMAIL PROTECTED](0.80-alpha) was released at 04/29/2005. And we just updated the newer version (v0.81) today. ver. 0.81: 1. Changes all initial & free functions. To avoid the error when free function try to call s

RE: rfc2385 support

Hi Lee, Running on FreeBSD 5.4 with latest ports collection. How can i remove some compile options? The error is on OSPF btu I don't need it. BGP is not reporting any errors. I am getting the following errors: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make install clean =

RE: novell through freebsd firewall

Thanks for your reply. I use pf from OpenBSD and nat does not allow unicast responses. Is it possible to run nat and multicast on FreeBSD successfully? Vanyushenkov Alexey Russia -Original Message- From: Biswas, Anumita [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 9:14 PM To:

Re: nfsd send error -1

Neo-Vortex wrote: On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Heinrich Rebehn wrote: Hi list, I got several of the above errors in my /var/log/messages. Can someone tell me what this means? I don't see any errors... forgot to put them in? ~Neo-Vortex Sorry, i put it into the subject line: nfsd send error -1

Re: The performances of [EMAIL PROTECTED] v0.8-alpha

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 02:41:40AM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote: > > > On Wed, 1 Jun 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >We use SPECweb99 to experiment 300, 600 and 1000 simultaneous > >connections on four testing platforms including the [EMAIL PROTECTED] on > >FreeBSD v5.3, Apache v1.3.3 on Fr

RE: rfc2385 support

Thanks for the info. I'm currently rebuilding the kernel on FreeBSD5.4 with FAST_IPSEC and TCP_SIGNATURE added to options and crypto added to device. Will post the result. Regards, From: Lee Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2005 12:50 P

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] released!

On Tue, 31 May 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have designed and implemented a novel kernel web accelerator, named as [EMAIL PROTECTED], and released v0.8-alpha at openketa.sourceforge.net. It has similar function as TUX at Redhat. [EMAIL PROTECTED] has software pipeline architecture. It de

Re: The performances of [EMAIL PROTECTED] v0.8-alpha

On Wed, 1 Jun 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We use SPECweb99 to experiment 300, 600 and 1000 simultaneous connections on four testing platforms including the [EMAIL PROTECTED] on FreeBSD v5.3, Apache v1.3.3 on FreeBSD v5.3, Apache v1.3.3 on Redhat Enterprise Linux v3.0, and TUX 3.2.14 on Red

Re: nfsd send error -1

On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Heinrich Rebehn wrote: > Hi list, > > I got several of the above errors in my /var/log/messages. Can someone > tell me what this means? I don't see any errors... forgot to put them in? ~Neo-Vortex ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org maili

Re: The performances of [EMAIL PROTECTED] v0.8-alpha

On Wed, 1 Jun 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Mean Resp. Time (ms)/ Weighted Bandwidth (bps)/ Valid+Invalid > connections/ Confirming Connections/ Throughput ops/sec > Apache(FreeBSD) 410.0 303272.69 300+0 50 761 > Apache(RHEL)382.2 313600.49 300+0 56 765 > Apache(F

The performances of [EMAIL PROTECTED] v0.8-alpha

We use one server and several PCs to test [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s performances. The server has two Xeon 2.4GHz CPUs (disabled the hyperthread function), 2 GB DDR2 memory, one 37 GB 1 rpm SCSI hard disk and a Gigabit Ethernet network adaptor. Client PCs have a Pentium 4 2.0 GHz CPU, 512 DDR memor