Hello!
I want to implement 802.1p priority tagging for VLAN. I made this dirty
patch and wonder - it works for me. May somebody look at it and tell me
is this enough for BSD community or should I look and patch something more?
--
With respect,
Boris
--- sbin/ifconfig/ifconfig.h.orig
Mike Wolman wrote:
I had major grief with the em driver and vlans,
i have found by tcpdumping on the em0 interface
actually causes more problems.
there are some more posts about this a couple of months ago,
my resolution was to swap the em card for an fxp instead as
the box was in production and i
Jon Simola wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:01:52 -0800, Charlie Schluting
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now, in 5.3, the only thing I can get working is to configure the em0 int with
the IP, and set the trunk to have the native vlan corresponding to that IP.
Weird.
Sounds like you're not getting the
I had major grief with the em driver and vlans,
i have found by tcpdumping on the em0 interface
actually causes more problems.
there are some more posts about this a couple of months ago,
my resolution was to swap the em card for an fxp instead as
the box was in production and i didnt have other op
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:01:52 -0800, Charlie Schluting
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now, in 5.3, the only thing I can get working is to configure the em0 int with
> the IP, and set the trunk to have the native vlan corresponding to that IP.
> Weird.
Sounds like you're not getting the module loade
Did something change from 5.2.1 to 5.3?
In 5.2.1 I used to have a config where the parent device, em(4), didn't have an
IP, and the vlan dev had the IP address. (yes, the parent device was "UP") I
then configured the trunk (on the switch) to have a native vlan of something
other than the vlan in
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 11:16:01AM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
A> > On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 01:32:35AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
A> > J> If each active divert socket number had a pointer to the module to which it
A> > J> was attached then you could divert to either in-k
Hi,..
I just formatted freeBSD4.9. i want it run as a router and a firewall. does
anybody out here can help me out.. and commands do i want.. from complete to
become a sevver.. thanks..
-
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Secon
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 08:57:51AM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote:
B> Off the top of my head, I don't like the idea. What are the savings in
B> doing so? Is there a guarantee that you won't need more then one at
B> once?
Well, I've spent enough braincycles arguing with myself, so I ask
you to decide
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 03:34:26PM +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 11:16:01AM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> A> > On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 01:32:35AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> A> > J> If each active divert socket number had a pointer to the module to
> which it
> A> > J
Hello to freebsd-net,
please, do you have some net-points to our discussion? It groved from
docs-only problem ( http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=76399 )
to net-related questions too.
Thanks.
Giorgos Keramidas wrote (2005/01/19):
> On 2005-01-19 14:20, Rudolf Cejka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 11:16:01AM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
A> > On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 01:32:35AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
A> > J> If each active divert socket number had a pointer to the module to
which it
A> > J> was attached then you could divert to either in-kernel netgraph
targe
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 01:32:35AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
J> If each active divert socket number had a pointer to the module to which it
J> was attached then you could divert to either in-kernel netgraph targets or
J> to userland socket based targets. Currently of you divert to a divert
J>
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 02:27:47PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
J> firstly.. I was thinking that there are several good ways to mesh the
J> ipfw/divert/netgraph
J> stuff.
J>
J> Firstly there is the possibility of making the ipfw stuff a netgraph
J> node itself..
Yes, but t
Guohan Lu wrote:
Hi,
netstat only shows the traffic per interface, I need traffic
information per socket. Is there a tool to do this?
not directly..
though trafshow may get you that information under some situations.
(ports/net/trafshow)
Best regards,
Guohan
_
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 02:27:47PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
J> firstly.. I was thinking that there are several good ways to mesh the
J> ipfw/divert/netgraph
J> stuff.
J>
J> Firstly there is the possibility of making the ipfw stuff a netgraph
J> node itself..
Yes, but this is a separate nod
16 matches
Mail list logo
