Re: TCP/IP over USB

2004-12-23 Thread Pat Lashley
--On Thursday, December 23, 2004 13:25:16 +0900 Sangwoo Shim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 07:15:16PM -0800, Pat Lashley wrote: [snip] Now that that's out of the way, Sangwoo, could you post the details of your dubp + ng_eiface solution? I might want to switch to that. -Pat A

Re: Quick question about the tired ipf/ipnat/"dmz"/bridge scenario

2004-12-23 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Andrew Heyn wrote: > Quoting http://www.moatware.com/support/docbook/faq-bridge.html, > > 10.8. Why can't hosts on a NATed interface talk to hosts on a bridged > interface? > This frequently happens when someone wants to bridge an interface to their > WAN to use it as a

RE: %cpu in system - squid performance in FreeBSD 5.3

2004-12-23 Thread Jeff Behl
As a follow up to the below (original message at the very bottom), I installed a load balancer in front of the machines which terminates the tcp connections from clients and opens up a few, persistent connections to each server over which requests are pipelined. In this scenario everything is co

Re: double vlans - once again - experiment unsucsessfull

2004-12-23 Thread Donatas
well, we've tired both "tunings" - the short-one suggested my M.Balikov and the longer-one, suggested by B.Davis in both cases - "Protocol not supported" how we've done this: on FreeBSD 5.3 stable: edited if_vlan.c then make buildworld make installworld mergemaster make clean t