--On Thursday, December 23, 2004 13:25:16 +0900 Sangwoo Shim <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 07:15:16PM -0800, Pat Lashley wrote:
[snip]
Now that that's out of the way, Sangwoo, could you post the details
of your dubp + ng_eiface solution? I might want to switch to that.
-Pat
A
If memory serves me right, Andrew Heyn wrote:
> Quoting http://www.moatware.com/support/docbook/faq-bridge.html,
>
> 10.8. Why can't hosts on a NATed interface talk to hosts on a bridged
> interface?
> This frequently happens when someone wants to bridge an interface to their
> WAN to use it as a
As a follow up to the below (original message at the very bottom), I
installed a load balancer in front of the machines which terminates the
tcp connections from clients and opens up a few, persistent connections
to each server over which requests are pipelined. In this scenario
everything is co
well, we've tired both "tunings" - the short-one suggested my M.Balikov and the
longer-one, suggested by B.Davis
in both cases - "Protocol not supported"
how we've done this:
on FreeBSD 5.3 stable:
edited if_vlan.c
then
make buildworld
make installworld
mergemaster
make clean
t