> This is something else which needs a pcap/tcpdump update. Currently there
> is no way to specify this behaviour at runtime.
>
> Hopefully this should be resolved at the next import.
Do you know when it is scheduled ?
--
Jeremie Le Hen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 13:22:10 +0100,
> "Konstantin KABASSANOV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I have a freebsd box with a gif tunnel configured. I observed that even if
> ifconfig displays MTU 1500 for both gif and physical interface, 1300 bytes
> ipv6 packets transiting on the gif interface
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 06:21:07PM -0800, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 03:53:07PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > I'll take care of this but I'm busy right now. Look into it later this
> > week.
>
> Thanks for looking into this, this is one of the items which came up on
> t
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 03:53:07PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> I'll take care of this but I'm busy right now. Look into it later this week.
Thanks for looking into this, this is one of the items which came up on
the TODO lists of three separate projects (TowardEX's, XORP's, and the
Network Ju
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 01:02:09PM -0600, Scott M. Ferris wrote:
> ucarp will compile and run, but will silently fail to send heartbeats
> due to the way libpcap
> opens bpf on FreeBSD. You can find a patch to libpcap in PR 72814.
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=72814
This is some
I'm looking for suggestions to the problem below, any help appreciated !!
I have several offices which use LAT MOP and IPX. This works over the
existing WAN as it is a combination of bridging and routing (routed IP ).
I would like to move to a pure IP network, but need to transport these
protoco
Hi Max,
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 09:06:58PM +0100, Max Laier wrote:
> Any reason you didn't include the following (also part
> of OpenBSD rev. 1.47)?:
>
I developed it independently of OpenBSD, and only later
found that OpenBSD also had it, so I missed this part.
It's indeed needed.
> | /*
At Wed, 8 Dec 2004 13:22:10 +0100,
Konstantin KABASSANOV wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> Hello,
>
> I have a freebsd box with a gif tunnel configured. I observed that even if
> ifconfig displays MTU 1500 for both gif and physical interface, 1300 bytes
> ipv6 packets transiting on the gif interface are systema
On Tuesday 07 December 2004 15:59, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> Hi Max,
>
> I played today with "netmasked aliases", and found what
> appears to be another bug.
>
> Adding an alias to the Ethernet interface with the same
> netmask results in this address not being pingable from
> this host -- it just sp
I have a really really strange kevent problem(i think anyway) that has
really stumped me.
Here's the scenario:
Three mostly identical servers running 5.2.1 or 5.3 (problem exists on
both). All three running thttpd sending out large files to thousands of
clients. Thttpd internally uses kqueue/k
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 11:58:49 +0200, Vladimir Terziev
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Hi Jeremie,
>
>I've managed to build UCARP binary on FreeBSD 4.x without any problem.
> Now i have to test it how good it works.
ucarp will compile and run, but will silently fail to send heartbeats
due to
Michal Mertl wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I think some network administrators may want to set different maximum rate
> for different types of ICMP replies. Currently the limit
> net.inet.icmp.icmplim is enforced independently for the following cases -
> ICMP echo-reply, ICMP timestamp reply, ICMP port u
Hello,
I think some network administrators may want to set different maximum rate
for different types of ICMP replies. Currently the limit
net.inet.icmp.icmplim is enforced independently for the following cases -
ICMP echo-reply, ICMP timestamp reply, ICMP port unreachable (generated as a
respo
Hello,
I have a freebsd box with a gif tunnel configured. I observed that even if
ifconfig displays MTU 1500 for both gif and physical interface, 1300 bytes
ipv6 packets transiting on the gif interface are systematically fragmented
while transiting on the lower physical interface to 1280 bytes. Is
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, Iasen Kostov wrote:
> #:> ident if_em.c
> if_em.c:
> $FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/em/if_em.c,v 1.44.2.4 2004/11/23 22:28:40
> rwatson Exp $
>
> I've deleted the whole dir and cvsuped. Does 1.54 differs much from
> 1.44.2.4 ?
Very odd. I have 1.44.2.4 checked out here, and i
Iasen Kostov wrote:
Iasen Kostov wrote:
Robert Watson wrote:
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, Iasen Kostov wrote:
The patch generates .rej against this version:
/*$FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/em/if_em.c,v 1.44.2.4 2004/11/23 22:28:40
rwatson Exp $*/
should I use the version from -CURRENT or it is possible (
Iasen Kostov wrote:
Robert Watson wrote:
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, Iasen Kostov wrote:
The patch generates .rej against this version:
/*$FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/em/if_em.c,v 1.44.2.4 2004/11/23 22:28:40
rwatson Exp $*/
should I use the version from -CURRENT or it is possible (adjusted
patch) to
Robert Watson wrote:
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, Iasen Kostov wrote:
The patch generates .rej against this version:
/*$FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/em/if_em.c,v 1.44.2.4 2004/11/23 22:28:40
rwatson Exp $*/
should I use the version from -CURRENT or it is possible (adjusted
patch) to work with this on
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, Iasen Kostov wrote:
> The patch generates .rej against this version:
>
> /*$FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/em/if_em.c,v 1.44.2.4 2004/11/23 22:28:40
> rwatson Exp $*/
> should I use the version from -CURRENT or it is possible (adjusted
> patch) to work with this one ?
Odd. I succ
Robert Watson wrote:
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004, Iasen Kostov wrote:
Is there an update on this case or I should find a way to disable
all hw "things" in the driver ?:) (because things are getting hot here
:).
Try the attached patch? The vlan header in promisc mode was getting
inserted after t
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004, Iasen Kostov wrote:
> Is there an update on this case or I should find a way to disable
> all hw "things" in the driver ?:) (because things are getting hot here
> :).
Try the attached patch? The vlan header in promisc mode was getting
inserted after the mbuf was mapped
Hi Jeremie,
I've managed to build UCARP binary on FreeBSD 4.x without any problem. Now i
have to test it how good it works.
Vladimir
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 22:45:54 +0100
Jeremie Le Hen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > i need to implement gateway redundancy for our server farm. I
22 matches
Mail list logo
