Robert Watson wrote:
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, Iasen Kostov wrote:
<snip>The patch generates .rej against this version:
/*$FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/em/if_em.c,v 1.44.2.4 2004/11/23 22:28:40 rwatson Exp $*/
should I use the version from -CURRENT or it is possible (adjusted patch) to work with this one ?
Odd. I successfully applied the patch against RELENG_5 here before
sending it out, and against the same revision. Could you try deleting
if_em, re-updating, and re-applying? The change to remove the busdma map
deletion is needed because in the patched version, those failures occur
before the mapping is allocated. There was a revision of if_em after
initial attempts to fix the problem that didn't properly free the
mappings, but I think it was the .3 revision in RELENG_5. One might
expect the new patch to reject against that older revision because the
deletions had not yet been inserted (so to speak).
#:> ls -l if_em.c -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 109829 Nov 24 00:28 if_em.c
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/dev/em on ttypf #:> patch < if_em.patch Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: if_em.c |=================================================================== |RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/dev/em/if_em.c,v |retrieving revision 1.54 |diff -u -r1.54 if_em.c |--- if_em.c 14 Nov 2004 20:20:28 -0000 1.54 |+++ if_em.c 8 Dec 2004 10:30:03 -0000 -------------------------- Patching file if_em.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1220 (offset 17 lines). Hunk #2 failed at 1243. Hunk #3 succeeded at 1266 with fuzz 2 (offset 17 lines). 1 out of 3 hunks failed--saving rejects to if_em.c.rej done
#:> ident if_em.c
if_em.c:
$FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/em/if_em.c,v 1.44.2.4 2004/11/23 22:28:40 rwatson Exp $
I've deleted the whole dir and cvsuped. Does 1.54 differs much from 1.44.2.4 ?
_______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
