On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 09:59:01PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Have you also forwarded this to Kame for comment?
Not yet, will do that this week however.
>
> I will try to take a look at this this week.
Thank you.
-J
>
> Later,
> George
> ___
Have you also forwarded this to Kame for comment?
I will try to take a look at this this week.
Later,
George
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Sunday 14 November 2004 04:49 pm, Barney Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When you have arpd (probably modified slightly) answer for a new "gateway"
> address, add it as an alias to the interface on which the arp request was
> received, with a netmask that will cover the address from which the
Archie Cobbs wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
If I did it again I think I'd suggest that divert not be a part of the
INET family..
It was easiest tat that time to make it so..
Archie, do you remember why we decided this?
At the time, the goal was to minimize the size of the divert patch rath
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 08:17:41AM -0600, Archie Cobbs wrote:
A> > Since it is working, it was not noticed quickly. Real problems occur when
A> > a multicast packet comes on interface: it is diverted to ng_ksocket, returned
A> > and div_output() sends it to ip_output(). In ip_
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
Hi!
I've spent several days digging in interaction between divert
protocol and ng_ksocket. I've find some oddities in there.
Look at div_output(), it tells incoming packet from outgoing
by presence of sockaddr_in structure. Depending on it packet
is passed either to ip_inpu
Folks,
Attached is initial code for ip6_fastforward() that I'm proposing for FreeBSD
5.x. This code was written for an internally modified FreeBSD 4.9, however in
the next few weeks, I will be porting this into FreeBSD 5.3 tree and submit a
final draft for review back to freebsd-net here. However
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> > Since it is working, it was not noticed quickly. Real problems occur when
> > a multicast packet comes on interface: it is diverted to ng_ksocket,
> > returned
> > and div_output() sends it to ip_output(). In ip_output() it is
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 08:17:41AM -0600, Archie Cobbs wrote:
A> > Since it is working, it was not noticed quickly. Real problems occur when
A> > a multicast packet comes on interface: it is diverted to ng_ksocket,
returned
A> > and div_output() sends it to ip_output(). In ip_output() it is
ip_ml
Ð ÐÐ, 15/11/2004 Ð 18:28 +0100, SÅawek Åak ÐÐÑÐÑ:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to ask why a static arp entry is added when direct route to host
> is
> added like this?
>
> route add -host target -iface interface
>
> The route(8) manpage says, that such route entry is for hosts directly
>
Ð ÐÐ, 15/11/2004 Ð 18:28 +0100, SÅawek Åak ÐÐÑÐÑ:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to ask why a static arp entry is added when direct route to host
> is
> added like this?
>
> route add -host target -iface interface
>
> The route(8) manpage says, that such route entry is for hosts directly
>
Hi,
I'd like to ask why a static arp entry is added when direct route to host is
added like this?
route add -host target -iface interface
The route(8) manpage says, that such route entry is for hosts directly
reachable over interface. But when packets go out on this interface
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Since it is working, it was not noticed quickly. Real problems occur when
> a multicast packet comes on interface: it is diverted to ng_ksocket, returned
> and div_output() sends it to ip_output(). In ip_output() it is
> ip_mloopback()ed
> and if_simloop()ed. A copy of packe
Current FreeBSD problem reports
Critical problems
Serious problems
S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description
---
o [2002/07/26] kern/41007 net overfull traffic on third and fourth adap
o [2003/10/14] kern
Hi!
I've spent several days digging in interaction between divert
protocol and ng_ksocket. I've find some oddities in there.
Look at div_output(), it tells incoming packet from outgoing
by presence of sockaddr_in structure. Depending on it packet
is passed either to ip_input() or ip_output(
15 matches
Mail list logo
