Archie Cobbs wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
If I did it again I think I'd suggest that divert not be a part of the INET family..
It was easiest tat that time to make it so..
Archie, do you remember why we decided this?
At the time, the goal was to minimize the size of the divert patch rather than maximizing elegance, because this was determined to give it a better chance of being committed... in hindsight we could have structured things more clearly.
yeah I remember now..
_______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
